Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2026-13741

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Digits: WordPress Mobile Number Signup and Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 9.1.0.5. This is due to missing authorization and role validation in the `dig_update_wpwc_custom_fields()` function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to escalate their privileges to Administrator by submitting a forged `digits_reg_userrole` value during profile update, granted the site administrator has configured the built-in DIGITS User Role field.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Digits WordPress plugin up to version 9.1.0.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the `dig_update_wpwc_custom_fields()` function due to missing authorization checks and role validation. Authenticated users with Subscriber-level access or higher can submit a forged `digits_reg_userrole` parameter during profile updates to escalate their privileges to Administrator, provided the site administrator has configured the built-in DIGITS User Role field.

MitigationUpdate the Digits plugin to a version beyond 9.1.0.5 when available. Until then, disable the DIGITS User Role field configuration and review user accounts for unauthorized administrator privileges.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Digits plugin installation
    Check your WordPress plugins directory or the WordPress admin Plugins page for the Digits plugin. Note the installed version number.
    Affected if The Digits plugin is not installed on the WordPress site.
  2. Compare installed version to affected range
    Compare the installed Digits plugin version against version 9.1.0.6. Check the plugin header in the main plugin file (typically digits.php or similar in wp-content/plugins/digits) for the Version field.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 9.1.0.6.
  3. Locate the DIGITS User Role field configuration
    In the WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Digits plugin settings. Look for a field labeled DIGITS User Role, User Role, or similar role assignment configuration. This is typically found under Digits Settings > General or a similar settings section.
    Affected if The DIGITS User Role field is present and has been configured (has a selected value) by an administrator.
  4. Verify subscriber-level access exists
    Check if there are any users with the Subscriber role on the site, or if the site allows user registration that results in Subscriber-level accounts.
    Affected if Subscriber-level user accounts exist or can be created on the site.

A site is affected if the Digits plugin version is below 9.1.0.6, the DIGITS User Role field is configured in plugin settings, and subscriber-level user accounts are present or can be created.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the Digits plugin to a version beyond 9.1.0.5 when available. Until then, disable the DIGITS User Role field configuration and review user accounts for unauthorized administrator privileges.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-13741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-13741 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data