CVE-2026-14198
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited@fastify/middie versions 9.1.0 through 9.3.2 decode the encoded slash %2F inside path parameter values before matching middleware paths, while Fastify's underlying router preserves the encoding during route lookup. The two layers disagree on the canonical request path, so the middleware fails to match a URL that the route handler does match. When middleware is used for authentication, authorization, rate limiting, or auditing on parameterized paths, an attacker can reach the protected handler by sending a single crafted URL with an encoded slash in the parameter position. The bypass is HTTP method agnostic and requires no authentication or special preconditions. Patches: upgrade to @fastify/middie 9.3.3. Workarounds: avoid parameterized middleware paths for security decisions, or enforce authentication at the route handler or via a Fastify hook that runs after the router has resolved the request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidence@fastify/middie decodes %2F in path parameter values before middleware path matching, while Fastify's router preserves the encoding. This inconsistency causes middleware to fail matching URLs that the route handler successfully matches, allowing attackers to bypass security controls like authentication, authorization, rate limiting, or auditing on parameterized routes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.1.0, < 9.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify @fastify/middie installationRun npm list @fastify/middie or check package.json dependencies to see if @fastify/middie is installedAffected if @fastify/middie is present in the dependencies
-
Check installed versionRun npm list @fastify/middie to get the exact version number, then compare to the affected range >= 9.1.0 and < 9.3.3Affected if The installed version falls within >= 9.1.0 and < 9.3.3
-
Inspect middleware path configurationsSearch codebase for middie.register or app.use calls with parameterized paths such as /:param or /:id patterns that handle security-sensitive operationsAffected if Parameterized middleware paths are used for authentication, authorization, rate limiting, or auditing
-
Identify security controls in middlewareReview middleware code to determine if security decisions (auth checks, rate limits, access control) are enforced at the middleware level on parameterized routesAffected if Security controls are enforced in middleware that matches against parameterized paths
You are affected if @fastify/middie version 9.1.0 through 9.2.x is installed AND you have parameterized middleware paths handling security-sensitive operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.3.3
Upgrade @fastify/middie to version 9.3.3 or later. As a workaround, avoid using parameterized middleware paths for security decisions and enforce authentication at the route handler level or via Fastify hooks that run after route resolution.
@fastify/middie version 9.3.3
- Check the current version of @fastify/middie in your project (npm list @fastify/middie or look in package.json)
- Update @fastify/middie to version 9.3.3 using your package manager (npm install @fastify/[email protected], yarn upgrade @fastify/[email protected], or pnpm update @fastify/[email protected])
- Run npm install or your lockfile update command to ensure the new version is installed
- Verify the installed version is 9.3.3 (npm list @fastify/middie)
- Test your application to confirm middleware path matching works correctly, including routes with encoded slashes in parameters
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-14198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-14198 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data