VulnerabilityAwaiting classification

CVE-2026-14261

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-09
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Xerte Online Tools allows for authentication bypass and remote code execution via reinstallation through the /setup/ folder, enabling attackers to reinstall the service to a remote database they control.

In the news

Third-party coverage
Trending covered by 1 outlet this week · latest 6d ago

Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Xerte Online Tools contains a critical vulnerability where the /setup/ folder allows unauthenticated reinstallation of the application. Attackers can exploit this to bypass authentication and achieve remote code execution by directing the reinstallation process to a database under their control, potentially allowing arbitrary command execution on the server.

MitigationImmediately restrict or disable access to the /setup/ folder via web server configuration (e.g., .htaccess rules or web server access controls), remove the setup directory from production deployments, and ensure a lockfile exists to prevent reinstallation after initial setup.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Xerte Online Tools installation
    Locate the Xerte installation directory on the web server (commonly in the web root, often under /xerte or as the root directory). Identify the presence of the main Xerte PHP files such as index.php, login.php, or the modules directory.
    Affected if Xerte Online Tools is installed on the server and the /setup/ folder is present.
  2. Verify /setup/ folder exists and is web-accessible
    Attempt to access http(s)://<your-server>/setup/ via a web request, or inspect the web server document root for the presence of a 'setup' directory containing installation PHP files.
    Affected if The /setup/ folder exists and returns a response (not a 403 or 404), indicating it is accessible over the web.
  3. Check for installation lockfile
    In the Xerte installation directory, look for a lockfile that prevents reinstallation. Common locations include a file named install_lock, lock, .lock, or a configuration flag in a config file indicating setup is complete.
    Affected if No lockfile exists or the lockfile is missing, allowing the setup process to run again.
  4. Review web server access controls for /setup/
    Examine web server configuration files (Apache .htaccess, Nginx config, IIS web.config) for rules that restrict or block access to the /setup/ directory.
    Affected if No web server rules exist to block or restrict access to /setup/, leaving it publicly accessible.

If Xerte Online Tools is installed, the /setup/ folder is web-accessible, no lockfile prevents reinstallation, and web server access controls do not restrict /setup/, then the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated reinstallation and potential remote code execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Immediately restrict or disable access to the /setup/ folder via web server configuration (e.g., .htaccess rules or web server access controls), remove the setup directory from production deployments, and ensure a lockfile exists to prevent reinstallation after initial setup.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,870
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,592.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-14261 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-14261 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data