dbcve.org
Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-1450

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The rognone plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'mode' parameter in versions up to, and including, 0.6.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The rognone WordPress plugin versions up to 0.6.2 are vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via the 'mode' parameter. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input sanitization and improper output escaping, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript through malicious URLs that trick users into clicking crafted links.

MitigationUpdate the rognone plugin to the latest version beyond 0.6.2 once available, or remove the plugin until a patched version is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the rognone plugin in your WordPress installation
    Check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'rognone' or search for 'rognone' in your WordPress plugins list via wp-admin > Plugins
    Affected if The rognone plugin folder exists in your plugins directory
  2. Determine the installed version of rognone plugin
    Check the main plugin file (usually rognone.php) for the 'Version' header comment, or view the plugin details in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins
    Affected if The reported version is 0.6.2 or lower (e.g., 0.6.2, 0.6.1, 0.6.0, etc.)
  3. Identify if the 'mode' parameter is processed by the plugin
    Search the plugin PHP files for occurrences of '$_GET' or '$_REQUEST' referencing 'mode' parameter, or examine forms/URLs that pass a 'mode' parameter to rognone functionality
    Affected if The plugin code reads a 'mode' parameter from URL requests without sanitization
  4. Test for the reflected XSS condition
    If the plugin is active and uses the 'mode' parameter, craft a test URL such as yoursite.com/?page=rognone&mode=test"><script>alert(1)</script> and observe if the mode value is reflected unescaped in the HTML output
    Affected if The mode parameter value appears verbatim in the page source without HTML encoding (the script tag executes or appears in the page)

You are affected if the rognone plugin is installed with version 0.6.2 or below and the 'mode' parameter is processed by the plugin, causing unsanitized user input to be reflected in HTTP responses.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the rognone plugin to the latest version beyond 0.6.2 once available, or remove the plugin until a patched version is released.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

rognone plugin version 0.6.3 or higher

  1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Find the 'rognone' plugin
  4. Check if an update is available and update to the latest version (higher than 0.6.2)
  5. Alternatively, download the latest version from the WordPress plugin repository and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1450 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1450 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data