CVE-2026-14799
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in CodeAstro Ecommerce Website 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /customer/my_account.php?my_wishlist. The manipulation of the argument delete_wishlist results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in CodeAstro Ecommerce Website 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the delete_wishlist parameter in /customer/my_account.php?my_wishlist. The lack of proper input sanitization or parameterized queries enables attackers to manipulate database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product and versionIdentify if your deployed application is CodeAstro Ecommerce Website version 1.0. Check your application documentation, installation files, or software inventory for the exact version number.Affected if The installed application is CodeAstro Ecommerce Website version 1.0 and the version matches the affected product.
-
Locate vulnerable scriptVerify if the file /customer/my_account.php exists in your web server's document root or application directory.Affected if The file /customer/my_account.php exists and is accessible via the web server.
-
Check wishlist feature accessDetermine if the my_wishlist functionality is enabled. Log in as a customer user and navigate to the wishlist section, or check if the my_wishlist parameter is accepted by the application.Affected if The my_wishlist feature is accessible to authenticated users and the delete_wishlist parameter is processed by the application.
-
Inspect SQL query handlingIf you have access to the application source code, examine the delete_wishlist parameter handling in /customer/my_account.php. Look for dynamic SQL construction where the delete_wishlist parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or input sanitization.Affected if The code uses the delete_wishlist parameter in dynamic SQL queries without proper escaping, prepared statements, or input validation.
You are affected if you run CodeAstro Ecommerce Website 1.0 with the /customer/my_account.php script present and the my_wishlist feature enabled, and the delete_wishlist parameter is handled using unsanitized dynamic SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries and implement proper input validation for the delete_wishlist parameter to neutralize SQL injection vectors.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-14799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-14799 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data