CVE-2026-14852
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPrivilege escalation in Checkmk versions 2.5.0 before 2.5.0p9, 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p34, 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p49, and 2.2.0 (EOL) allows a local unprivileged user to execute arbitrary commands as root by starting a process crafted to look like a SAP HANA instance. Without an explicit database configuration, the mk_sap_hana agent plugin derives instance identifiers from the process list and uses them to build a command executed with elevated privileges (requires the plugin to run as root with RUNAS=agent).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe mk_sap_hana monitoring plugin in Checkmk runs as root and builds commands using instance identifiers derived from the system process list. A local unprivileged user can craft a process to impersonate SAP HANA, causing the plugin to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges when it parses and acts on this deceptive process information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Checkmk installation and versionIdentify the installed Checkmk version by querying the package manager, checking the Checkmk web interface footer, or running 'cmk --version' if the command-line tool is available. Compare the version number against the fixed releases (2.5.0p9, 2.4.0p34, 2.3.0p49).Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.3.0p49, 2.4.0p34, or 2.5.0p9.
-
Locate the mk_sap_hana pluginSearch for the mk_sap_hana plugin file in the Checkmk installation directory, typically under the plugins or agents directory structure. Use commands like 'find /opt/checkmk -name mk_sap_hana*' to locate the plugin.Affected if The mk_sap_hana plugin file exists in the Checkmk installation.
-
Verify plugin execution contextCheck the ownership and permissions of the mk_sap_hana plugin file. Determine if the plugin executes as root by examining the file permissions and the user context under which Checkmk monitoring runs.Affected if The plugin runs with root privileges or elevated permissions.
-
Confirm SAP HANA monitoring is configuredInspect the Checkmk configuration for any active SAP HANA service definitions or host labels that would trigger the mk_sap_hana plugin execution. Check the Checkmk web interface or configuration files for SAP HANA monitoring rules.Affected if SAP HANA monitoring rules or services are defined and enabled in Checkmk.
-
Assess local user process creation capabilityEvaluate whether unprivileged local users have the ability to create or modify processes on the system. This is typically true by default on Linux systems but can be verified through process creation restrictions or sandboxing configurations.Affected if Unprivileged users can create arbitrary processes on the system.
A user is affected if they run a Checkmk version below the fixed releases, have the mk_sap_hana plugin present with root execution privileges, have SAP HANA monitoring enabled, and unprivileged local users can create processes on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Checkmk to version 2.5.0p9, 2.4.0p34, or 2.3.0p49 or later. As a compensating control, restrict local unprivileged access and review plugin permissions until patching is complete.
Upgrade to the latest patch release in your current branch (2.5.0p9+, 2.4.0p34+, or 2.3.0p49+) or migrate to a currently supported branch
- Identify the current Checkmk version by checking the installation
- If running Checkmk 2.5.0, upgrade to version 2.5.0p9 or later (preferably the latest 2.5.x patch)
- If running Checkmk 2.4.0, upgrade to version 2.4.0p34 or later (preferably the latest 2.4.x patch)
- If running Checkmk 2.3.0, upgrade to version 2.3.0p49 or later (preferably the latest 2.3.x patch)
- If running Checkmk 2.2.0 (EOL), migrate to a supported version branch (2.3.0p49+, 2.4.0p34+, or 2.5.0p9+)
- After upgrade, explicitly configure the SAP HANA database connection in the mk_sap_hana plugin configuration rather than relying on process-derived instance identifiers
- Verify the RUNAS=agent configuration is properly scoped to minimize privilege exposure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-14852 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-14852 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data