Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2026-1496

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-03-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Vulnerable versions of Coverity Connect lack an error handler in the authentication logic for command line tooling that makes it vulnerable to an authentication bypass. A malicious actor with access to the /token API endpoint that either knows or guesses a valid username, can use this in a specially crafted HTTP request to bypass authentication. Successful exploitation allows the malicious actor to assume all roles and privileges granted to the valid user’s Coverity Connect account.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Coverity Connect command line tooling has a missing error handler in the authentication logic for the /token API endpoint. An attacker who knows or can guess a valid username can send a specially crafted HTTP request to bypass authentication entirely and assume all roles and privileges of that user's account.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Synopsys for Coverity Connect to fix the authentication bypass; until patched, consider rate-limiting or restricting access to the /token endpoint to prevent exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Coverity Connect installation and version
    Locate the Coverity Connect installation directory and run 'coverity --version' or check version metadata files in the installation path
    Affected if The installed version is any version prior to the patched release containing proper error handling in /token endpoint authentication
  2. Verify network exposure of the /token API endpoint
    Check network configuration and firewall rules to determine if the Coverity Connect web interface (typically on port 8080 or 8443) and specifically the /token endpoint is accessible from untrusted networks
    Affected if The /token endpoint is exposed to network segments where untrusted users could send HTTP requests
  3. Review authentication logs for anomalous requests
    Examine Coverity Connect server logs for failed authentication attempts that succeeded unexpectedly, or requests to /token endpoint with valid usernames but missing or malformed credentials
    Affected if Logs show authentication successes on /token that lack proper credential submission or show patterns of username enumeration
  4. Check for unauthorized role or privilege escalation
    Review audit logs and user activity records for accounts exhibiting privileges or data access inconsistent with their expected role assignments
    Affected if User sessions or actions are recorded with roles/permissions that do not match the legitimate authentication context for that user

A user is affected if Coverity Connect is running and its /token endpoint is network-accessible to potential attackers, regardless of version, since the vulnerability allows bypassing authentication by knowing a valid username.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Synopsys for Coverity Connect to fix the authentication bypass; until patched, consider rate-limiting or restricting access to the /token endpoint to prevent exploitation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1496 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data