CVE-2026-14961
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPegatron `Tdelo64.sys` exposes a privileged device interface, `\\.\TdeIo`, that fails to properly restrict access to sensitive IOCTL functionality. The driver's IOCTL dispatcher does not validate caller privileges or verify user-supplied kernel memory addresses before performing memory operations. By sending crafted requests to IOCTL, a local attacker can achieve arbitrary kernel memory read and write operations, leading to privilege escalation to `NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM`, security product bypass, credential theft, or complete system compromise.
In the news
Third-party coverageSurfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Pegatron Tdelo64.sys driver exposes a privileged device interface (\\.\\TdeIo) that lacks proper access controls. Its IOCTL dispatcher fails to validate caller privileges and does not verify user-supplied kernel memory addresses before performing memory operations, allowing a local attacker to achieve arbitrary kernel memory read/write and escalate to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Tdelo64.sys driver exists on the systemSearch for Tdelo64.sys file in system directories: check C:\Windows\System32\drivers\ and use 'dir /s C:\*Tdelo64.sys' or Get-ChildItem -Path C:\ -Recurse -Filter Tdelo64.sys -ErrorAction SilentlyContinueAffected if The Tdelo64.sys file is found in any system directory
-
Check if the Tdelo64.sys driver is loadedRun 'sc query Tdelo64' or 'driverquery /v | findstr Tdelo64' to query the driver service status, or use 'fltenum.exe' or similar driver enumeration toolsAffected if The driver appears in the list of loaded/running drivers with a running state
-
Verify if the vulnerable device interface existsUse Sysinternals WinObj or run 'devicequery' to enumerate device objects and check for \Device\TdeIo or \GLOBAL??\TdeIo, or inspect output from 'sd \.\TdeIo' if availableAffected if The \.\TdeIo device interface is present and accessible on the system
-
Check driver version informationRight-click Tdelo64.sys file, select Properties > Details, or use 'powershell (Get-Item "C:\Windows\System32\drivers\Tdelo64.sys").VersionInfo' to retrieve file version metadataAffected if A version exists but cannot be compared to fixed releases (no patched version range documented); any version found is potentially vulnerable
-
Confirm the IOCTL dispatcher is reachableAttempt to open the device with CreateFile("\\.\\TdeIo", ...) and send IOCTLs using a tool like ioctlbf or write a test application that communicates with the device - verify no privilege check is performedAffected if The device can be opened and IOCTL calls succeed without requiring elevated privileges or returning access denied errors
If the Tdelo64.sys driver is loaded and the \.\TdeIo device interface exists on the system, the environment is affected by this vulnerability because the IOCTL dispatcher lacks proper privilege validation and kernel memory address verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable or remove the vulnerable Tdelo64.sys driver if not required for system operation. If required, apply vendor-supplied patches that add proper privilege validation and kernel memory address verification in the IOCTL dispatcher.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-14961 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-14961 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data