CVE-2026-15030
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds Read in ASUS System Control Interface v3, ASUS System Control Interface, and ASUS Business Manager allows a local administrator to read memory regions beyond the intended firmware boundary by supplying a crafted IOCTL request that bypasses the validation. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS System Control Interface ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut-of-bounds read vulnerability in ASUS System Control Interface drivers (v3, standard, and Business Manager) allows a local administrator to read memory beyond the intended firmware boundary via a crafted IOCTL request that bypasses input validation. This is a kernel-mode driver flaw resulting in information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ASUS System Control Interface driversOpen Device Manager, expand 'System devices', and look for 'ASUS System Control Interface' or related entries. Also check Programs and Features for ASUS-related software packages.Affected if Any ASUS System Control Interface driver (v3, standard, or Business Manager) is installed and the version is within the vulnerable range disclosed in ASUS Security Advisory ASA-2026-001 or later.
-
Locate and identify the driver fileSearch for ASUS kernel drivers in %SystemRoot%\System32\drivers\ (e.g., AsSysCtrlDrv.sys, AsusSysCtrl.sys, or similar naming patterns). Use 'driverquery /v' or 'Get-ItemProperty' on suspected driver files to retrieve version info.Affected if A driver file with 'SysCtrl', 'SystemControl', or 'ASUS' in the name exists and its version matches the vulnerable versions from the ASUS advisory.
-
Verify the driver is loaded in kernel memoryRun 'sc query asus' or 'driverquery /v | findstr -i asus' to check if the ASUS driver service is running. Also check with 'lsdriver' or 'fltmc' if available.Affected if The ASUS System Control Interface driver service is in a 'Running' state, meaning the IOCTL handler is active and processing requests.
-
Check for exposed IOCTL device interfaceUse 'winobj' or 'device tree' tools to examine \Device\ and \GLOBAL??\ for ASUS device objects (commonly named '\\Device\\ASUS_System_Control_Interface' or similar). Run 'ls -la /dev/asi*' on WSL if applicable, or monitor with Process Monitor for DeviceIoActivity.Affected if An ASUS device interface is present and accessible, indicating the IOCTL entry point exists for the vulnerable handler.
-
Review IOCTL code paths for vulnerability indicatorsIf you have access to the driver binary, analyze IOCTL codes 0x9c40xxxx ranges (common for ASUS sysctrl). Monitor with tools like DriverMon or IOCTLizer for any out-of-bounds memory access patterns using 'WinDbg' or 'OSR Debugger' attached to the driver.Affected if The driver processes IOCTL requests without proper bounds validation, allowing memory reads beyond firmware boundaries. This is confirmed by the vendor advisory.
A system is affected if ASUS System Control Interface (v3, standard, or Business Manager) driver is installed and running, with a version that falls within the vulnerable range specified in the official ASUS security advisory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch from ASUS Security Advisory when available; until then, restrict administrative access and monitor for suspicious IOCTL calls. The fix requires updating the driver with proper bounds checking in the IOCTL handler.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15030 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data