CVE-2026-1509
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Avada (Fusion) Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary WordPress Action Execution in all versions up to, and including, 3.15.1. This is due to the plugin's `output_action_hook()` function accepting user-controlled input to trigger any registered WordPress action hook without proper authorization checks. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to execute arbitrary WordPress action hooks via the Dynamic Data feature, potentially leading to privilege escalation, file inclusion, denial of service, or other security impacts depending on which action hooks are available in the WordPress installation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Avada (Fusion) Builder plugin for WordPress versions up to 3.15.1 contains an arbitrary action execution vulnerability in the output_action_hook() function. Authenticated attackers with Subscriber-level access can inject arbitrary WordPress action hook names via the Dynamic Data feature, triggering any registered WordPress action without authorization. This enables privilege escalation, potential file inclusion, or DoS depending on available hooks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Avada (Fusion) Builder is installedNavigate to WordPress dashboard > Plugins and confirm 'Avada' or 'Fusion Builder' appears in the installed plugins list with status 'Active'Affected if Avada or Fusion Builder plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Check installed Avada versionGo to Plugins > Installed Plugins > click 'View details' on Avada or check the plugin header comment in /wp-content/plugins/fusion-builder/fusion-builder.php for the version numberAffected if Version is 3.15.1 or lower (any version up to and including 3.15.1)
-
Confirm Dynamic Data feature existsAccess the Fusion Builder editor interface (found in page/post edit screens) and verify the Dynamic Data option is present and accessible in the builder optionsAffected if Dynamic Data feature is available and can be accessed by users with Subscriber-level permissions
-
Inspect for unauthorized action hooksReview WordPress audit logs, server access logs, or database for suspicious entries involving 'do_action', 'wp_ajax_fusion_builder_output_action', or custom action hook names in POST requests to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.phpAffected if Any unexpected or unauthorized action hook executions are logged or present in audit data
A user is affected if Avada (Fusion) Builder version 3.15.1 or lower is installed, the Dynamic Data feature is accessible, and no additional access controls beyond authentication are enforced.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Avada (Fusion) Builder to version 3.15.2 or later which adds proper authorization checks to the output_action_hook() function.
Latest Avada (Fusion) Builder version (likely 3.15.2 or higher)
- 1. Backup your WordPress site and database before making any changes
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- 3. Locate the Avada (Fusion) Builder plugin
- 4. Check if an update is available and update to the latest version
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version
- 6. Test that the Dynamic Data feature still functions correctly
- 7. Confirm that unauthorized users cannot trigger arbitrary action hooks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1509 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1509 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data