CVE-2026-15135
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Online Food Order System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /edit_food_items.php. The manipulation of the argument update results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the /edit_food_items.php file of code-projects Online Food Order System 1.0. The 'update' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the application versionCheck your web application's source code for version information, typically in a README, index.php, or config file, and confirm it is code-projects Online Food Order System version 1.0Affected if The installed application is code-projects Online Food Order System 1.0
-
Locate the vulnerable fileSearch for the file edit_food_items.php in your web root directory or source code repositoryAffected if The file edit_food_items.php exists in the application directory
-
Inspect the update parameter handlingOpen edit_food_items.php and search for occurrences of the 'update' parameter (e.g., $_GET['update'] or $_POST['update']). Examine how this parameter is used in SQL queries - look for direct concatenation or lack of parameterized queriesAffected if The 'update' parameter is used in SQL queries without proper sanitization, prepared statements, or parameter binding
-
Verify database interaction existsConfirm the application has a functional database connection and that edit_food_items.php performs database operations using the 'update' parameterAffected if The file executes SQL queries that incorporate the 'update' parameter directly into the query string
-
Confirm user input reaches the vulnerable codeReview the code flow to verify that user-supplied input for the 'update' parameter can reach the unsanitized SQL query without authentication or validation gatesAffected if The 'update' parameter flows from user input directly into SQL queries without validation
Your environment is affected if you run code-projects Online Food Order System 1.0 with the edit_food_items.php file present and the 'update' parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in edit_food_items.php, specifically validating and escaping the 'update' parameter before database operations.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15135 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data