CVE-2026-15190
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in SourceCodester Simple and Nice Shopping Cart Script 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /login.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument Username results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the login.php script of SourceCodester Simple and Nice Shopping Cart Script 1.0. The Username parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in an SQL query, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm application identity and versionInspect the application source code, footer, or any version file to verify this is SourceCodester Simple and Nice Shopping Cart Script version 1.0Affected if The application is running Simple and Nice Shopping Cart Script version 1.0 from SourceCodester
-
Locate the login.php scriptFind login.php in the web application root directoryAffected if login.php exists in the application root
-
Inspect SQL query handling in login.phpOpen login.php and examine how the Username parameter is incorporated into SQL queries - look for direct string concatenation or unsanitized variable insertionAffected if The Username parameter is used directly in an SQL query without parameterized queries or proper escaping
-
Check for input sanitization functionsSearch the login.php code for sanitization functions like mysqli_real_escape_string, htmlspecialchars, or input validation routines applied to the Username inputAffected if No input sanitization or escaping is performed on the Username parameter before SQL execution
-
Verify database query construction methodReview the code around the SQL query that processes login credentials - check if prepare() or bind_param() methods are used for parameterized queriesAffected if SQL queries are constructed using string concatenation or interpolation with user input rather than prepared statements
A user is affected if they are running SourceCodester Simple and Nice Shopping Cart Script version 1.0 and the login.php script uses dynamic SQL queries with the Username parameter without parameterized queries or input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) for the login functionality, ensuring all user inputs are treated as data rather than executable code.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15190 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15190 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data