CVE-2026-15288
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SureForms – Drag and Drop Form Builder for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1. This is due to the plugin accepting the payment amount directly from user-controlled POST data in the 'create_payment_intent' and 'create_subscription_intent' functions without validating it against the form's configured price. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the payment amount to any arbitrary value when submitting a Stripe payment form, potentially purchasing products or services at significantly reduced prices.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SureForms WordPress plugin accepts payment amounts directly from user-controlled POST data in the create_payment_intent and create_subscription_intent functions without validating against the form's configured price. This allows unauthenticated attackers to submit arbitrary payment values, purchasing goods/services at reduced prices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SureForms plugin installationIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate SureForms, or check the plugin version via wp-content/plugins/sureforms/readme.txtAffected if SureForms plugin is installed and active
-
Identify installed SureForms versionCheck the plugin version number from the WordPress plugins page or the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/sureforms/sureforms.phpAffected if Installed version falls within the vulnerable version range (if known) or is an unpatched release
-
Verify Stripe payment functionality is enabledReview SureForms settings and check if any forms are configured to accept payments via Stripe integration (look for payment-enabled forms or Stripe connection settings)Affected if Stripe payment processing is enabled and forms are configured to accept payments
-
Inspect payment intent functions for missing validationExamine the plugin source code in the create_payment_intent and create_subscription_intent functions; verify if POST parameters (e.g., amount, price, payment_amount) are used directly without server-side validation against the form's configured priceAffected if The functions accept and process payment values from POST data without validating they match the form's configured price
-
Check for server-side price validationReview the payment processing logic to determine if there is code that compares the submitted payment amount to the form's stored/configured price before creating the Stripe payment intentAffected if No server-side validation exists to ensure submitted payment amount equals the configured form price
A user is affected if SureForms is installed with Stripe payment functionality enabled and the payment intent functions accept POST data values without server-side validation against the configured form price.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement server-side validation in the affected functions to ensure the submitted payment amount matches the form's configured price before processing any Stripe payment intent.
Update to version 2.2.2 or later (check wordpress.org for the latest stable release)
- 1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate SureForms – Drag and Drop Form Builder for WordPress
- 4. Check if an update is available and update to the latest version
- 5. Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/sureforms/ and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- 6. Verify the update was successful and test payment forms to confirm the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15288 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15288 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data