CVE-2026-15289
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the ‘wpdevart_id’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.17 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. In order to exploit the vulnerability, the Pro version of the plugin must be installed and activated, with the 'Delete previous dates' option checked.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Booking Calendar plugin fails to properly sanitize the 'wpdevart_id' parameter before using it in SQL queries, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject time-based SQL queries. Exploitation requires the Pro version to be installed with the 'Delete previous dates' option enabled.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Booking Calendar plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and locate the Booking Calendar plugin. Note the installed version from the plugin list.Affected if Plugin is not installed or not the Pro version
-
Confirm Pro version in useAccess the Booking Calendar settings page or plugin header to verify it is the Pro version rather than the free version.Affected if The installed version is the free version only
-
Locate Delete previous dates settingGo to Booking Calendar > Settings > General or Dates settings panel. Look for an option labeled 'Delete previous dates' or similar.Affected if The setting cannot be found or is not accessible (may indicate free version)
-
Verify Delete previous dates is enabledExamine the checkbox or toggle for the 'Delete previous dates' option. Check if it is currently checked or set to enabled.Affected if The Delete previous dates option is enabled
User is affected if the Booking Calendar Pro version is installed with the Delete previous dates option enabled, allowing unauthenticated SQL injection via the wpdevart_id parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to version 3.2.18 or later which contains the fix; alternatively, disable the 'Delete previous dates' option until patching is possible.
Plugin version 3.2.18 or latest available version (upgrade from 3.2.17 and earlier)
- Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate the 'Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System' plugin
- Check if the Pro version is activated and the 'Delete previous dates' option is enabled in plugin settings
- Update the plugin to the latest available version (version 3.2.18 or later, as 3.2.17 and earlier are affected)
- Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15289 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15289 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data