Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2026-15373

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was detected in Eleveo Call Recording Software 9.7.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /callrec/userAddAction.do. Performing a manipulation of the argument role results in improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Eleveo Call Recording Software 9.7.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in /callrec/userAddAction.do. The role parameter can be manipulated during user creation to bypass authorization checks, potentially allowing unauthorized users to escalate privileges or create accounts with elevated roles.

MitigationImplement proper server-side authorization validation before processing user creation requests. Validate that the authenticated user has permission to assign specific roles, and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) checks on the role parameter.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Eleveo Call Recording Software installation and version
    Locate Eleveo installation directory or check application startup/version information. Common locations include /opt/eleveo or C:\Program Files\Eleveo. Check for version.txt, about page, or application headers displaying version 9.7.0.
    Affected if Eleveo Call Recording Software version 9.7.0 is installed and running
  2. Verify the vulnerable endpoint exists
    Check if the web application exposes /callrec/userAddAction.do. This can be done by reviewing web server configuration files, checking the deployed WAR/webapp directory, or attempting to access the endpoint via HTTP request if you have authorized access to the application.
    Affected if The /callrec/userAddAction.do endpoint is present in the deployed application
  3. Confirm user creation functionality is enabled
    Review the application configuration to determine if the user creation module (userAddAction.do) is active and not disabled. Check web.xml or application configuration files for servlet mappings related to userAddAction.
    Affected if The userAddAction.do servlet is actively mapped and enabled in the web application configuration
  4. Inspect role assignment authorization logic
    Examine the application source code or decompiled classes for userAddAction.do to verify if server-side role validation is properly enforced. Look for authorization checks before processing the role parameter.
    Affected if The role parameter in user creation requests is not validated server-side against the authenticated user's permissions

You are affected if Eleveo Call Recording Software 9.7.0 is running with the /callrec/userAddAction.do endpoint accessible and the role parameter lacks proper server-side authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper server-side authorization validation before processing user creation requests. Validate that the authenticated user has permission to assign specific roles, and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) checks on the role parameter.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15373 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15373 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data