CVE-2026-15478
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in IceHRM up to 35.0.1. This impacts an unknown function of the file core/src/Reports/User/Reports/EmployeeAttendanceReport.php of the component UserReport Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument employeeList can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in IceHRM up to version 35.0.1 in the EmployeeAttendanceReport.php file. The employeeList parameter passed to the UserReport endpoint is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IceHRM installation and versionLocate the IceHRM installation directory on the server; check for version.php, VERSION file, or the admin panel under System > Version Info to identify the installed version numberAffected if Installed version is 35.0.1 or below
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch for EmployeeAttendanceReport.php within the IceHRM web directory structure, typically found under /src/ or /modules/ foldersAffected if EmployeeAttendanceReport.php file exists in the installation
-
Verify UserReport endpoint is accessibleCheck if the web application exposes the UserReport functionality (look for routes or links containing UserReport in the application)Affected if UserReport endpoint or module is accessible via the web interface
-
Inspect employeeList parameter handlingReview the source code of EmployeeAttendanceReport.php and locate where the employeeList parameter is used in SQL queries; check if it is directly concatenated into the query string without prepared statements or parameter bindingAffected if The employeeList parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization
Environment is affected if running IceHRM version 35.0.1 or below with the EmployeeAttendanceReport.php file present and the employeeList parameter being passed directly into SQL queries without parameterized binding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all SQL operations involving the employeeList parameter. Alternatively, apply any available vendor patch or upgrade to a version beyond 35.0.1. Perform input validation and employ least-privilege database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15478 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15478 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data