CVE-2026-15583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA confused-deputy flaw in Grafana MCP Server allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exfiltrate the server's environment-configured Grafana service-account token by supplying a crafted X-Grafana-URL request header. This also enables SSRF against arbitrary internal services, including cloud metadata endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Grafana MCP Server suffers from a confused-deputy vulnerability where an unauthenticated attacker can supply a malicious X-Grafana-URL header to trick the server into making requests to attacker-controlled URLs. Since the server uses a Grafana service-account token from its environment for authentication, attackers can capture this token by pointing the header to their controlled endpoint. The same mechanism enables SSRF attacks against internal services and cloud metadata endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Grafana MCP Server is installedCheck for the grafana-mcp-server binary or package on the system. Common locations include /usr/local/bin/, /usr/bin/, or via package managers (npm list @grafana/mcp-server, pip list, docker ps).Affected if The Grafana MCP Server binary or container is present on the system.
-
Determine the installed version of Grafana MCP ServerRun the version command for the installed package: grafana-mcp-server --version, npm list @grafana/mcp-server version, or check the Docker image tag. Compare the version to any published fixed versions from Grafana labs.Affected if The installed version matches the vulnerable version range (check Grafana security advisories for specific affected versions).
-
Verify X-Grafana-URL header acceptanceInspect the server configuration or source code to confirm the X-Grafana-URL header is processed and used to construct outbound requests. Look for code that uses this header value in HTTP requests without validation.Affected if The server accepts and uses the X-Grafana-URL header to direct outbound HTTP requests without strict allowlist validation.
-
Check for service-account token in environmentReview the environment variables where Grafana MCP Server runs: look for GRAFANA_TOKEN, GRAFANA_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN, or similar variables containing Grafana authentication credentials.Affected if A Grafana service-account token is present in the server's environment variables or configuration files.
-
Assess network accessibility from the serverReview firewall rules, network policies, or iptables/iptables-save output to determine if the server can make arbitrary outbound HTTP/HTTPS connections to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254).Affected if The server has unrestricted outbound network access allowing connections to arbitrary URLs including internal infrastructure.
You are affected if Grafana MCP Server is running with a service-account token in its environment, accepts the X-Grafana-URL header without validation, and has outbound network access that permits connections to attacker-controlled or internal endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist validation on the X-Grafana-URL header to only permit the configured Grafana instance URL, apply network segmentation to block outbound connections from the server to internal services and metadata endpoints, and rotate any potentially exposed service-account tokens.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data