CVE-2026-15675
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in code-projects Online Job Portal 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /Admin/EditUser.php. Such manipulation of the argument UserId leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in /Admin/EditUser.php where the UserId parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in database queries. An attacker can inject malicious SQL statements through this parameter to manipulate or extract data from the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the EditUser.php fileSearch the web server document root for the file /Admin/EditUser.php or EditUser.php within an Admin directoryAffected if The file exists in the web application directory structure
-
Verify UserId parameter handling in codeOpen EditUser.php and search for occurrences of 'UserId' or '$_GET'/'$_POST' usage in SQL query contexts. Check if the UserId value is directly concatenated into SQL strings without using prepared statements or escaping functionsAffected if The UserId parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterized queries, prepared statements, or input sanitization
-
Confirm database query executionIn EditUser.php, locate the database query execution lines (e.g., mysqli_query, mysql_query, PDO query, $db->execute) that incorporate the UserId parameterAffected if Dynamic SQL queries incorporating UserId are actually executed against a database
-
Check admin access controlsVerify if the /Admin/EditUser.php endpoint is accessible to unauthorized users by checking authentication/authorization logic at the top of the file or via web server configurationAffected if The EditUser.php page is accessible without proper admin authentication or authorization checks
-
Compare installed version to baselineIf version information is available in the application (check file headers, changelog, or version constant), document it for comparison against any future patchesAffected if Unable to determine version or version matches unremediated releases
The environment is affected if the EditUser.php file exists and contains SQL queries that directly incorporate the UserId parameter without parameterized queries, prepared statements, or input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in EditUser.php, and implement proper input validation for the UserId parameter. Apply principle of least privilege to the database user account.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15675 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15675 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data