Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2026-15701

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A weakness has been identified in Totolink NR1800X 9.1.0u.6279_B20210910. Affected by this issue is the function Form_Logout of the file /formLogout.htm of the component lighttpd. This manipulation of the argument Host causes stack-based buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in the Form_Logout function of lighttpd web server on Totolink NR1800X (firmware 9.1.0u.6279_B20210910). The vulnerability is triggered via the Host argument in /formLogout.htm, allowing remote attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code due to improper bounds checking.

MitigationThis is an end-of-life router with no vendor patch available; implement network segmentation to isolate the device, disable remote management interfaces, and strongly consider replacing with a currently supported device.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the router's web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model is Totolink NR1800X
    Affected if The device is a Totolink NR1800X router
  2. Check the installed firmware version
    Log into the router admin panel (typically at 192.168.1.1) and navigate to System Status or Firmware Upgrade section to view the current firmware version, or use the router's command line if accessible
    Affected if The firmware version is 9.1.0u.6279_B20210910 (exact match)
  3. Confirm lighttpd web server is running
    Check if the router's web management interface is accessible on the default HTTP/HTTPS ports (80/443) - the vulnerability exists in the lighttpd service that serves /formLogout.htm
    Affected if The lighttpd web server is running and responding to HTTP requests on the router
  4. Verify the vulnerable endpoint exists
    Attempt to access the URL path /formLogout.htm on the router's web server (e.g., http://<router-ip>/formLogout.htm) to confirm the endpoint is present
    Affected if The /formLogout.htm endpoint returns a valid HTTP response (200 or similar)
  5. Check for remote management exposure
    Determine if the router's web interface is accessible from external networks (not just LAN) - check router firewall settings, WAN access policies, or port forwarding rules that expose port 80/443 to the internet
    Affected if The router's web management interface is accessible from WAN/external networks

You are affected if you have a Totolink NR1800X router running firmware version 9.1.0u.6279_B20210910 with the lighttpd web server and /formLogout.htm endpoint accessible, especially from remote networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

This is an end-of-life router with no vendor patch available; implement network segmentation to isolate the device, disable remote management interfaces, and strongly consider replacing with a currently supported device.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,050
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15701 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15701 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data