CVE-2026-15746
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStrands Agents is an open-source Python SDK for building and running AI agents. The strands-agents-tools package provides pre-built tools for use with the SDK, including the elasticsearch_memory tool for agent memory storage. We identified CVE-2026-15746, a server-side request forgery (SSRF) issue in the elasticsearch_memory tool. The tool exposed its connection parameters (es_url, cloud_id, api_key) as fields the large language model (LLM) could control through the tool schema. When a caller omitted the api_key parameter, the tool fell back to the operator's ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable and sent it to whichever host the LLM specified. A crafted prompt could cause the tool to connect to a threat-actor-controlled server and disclose the operator's Elasticsearch API key in the Authorization header. We recommend you upgrade to strands-agents-tools version 0.7.0 or later. As a precautionary measure, we recommend all operators rotate their ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY, even if there is no indication the credential was exposed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the elasticsearch_memory tool of strands-agents-tools. The tool exposed connection parameters (es_url, cloud_id, api_key) that the LLM could control through the tool schema. When api_key was omitted, the tool fell back to the ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable and sent it to whatever host the LLM specified, allowing a crafted prompt to exfiltrate the Elasticsearch API key to a threat actor-controlled server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed strands-agents-tools versionRun `pip show strands-agents-tools` or check your dependency lock file for the strands-agents-tools version numberAffected if The installed version is below 0.7.0 (the fixed release)
-
Verify the ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable is setCheck if the ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable exists in your runtime environment using `echo $ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY` or inspect your environment configurationAffected if The ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable is present and populated with a valid credential
-
Confirm the elasticsearch_memory tool is enabledInspect your strands-agents-tools configuration or code that initializes the agent tools to determine if elasticsearch_memory is included in the active tool listAffected if The elasticsearch_memory tool is loaded and available to the LLM
-
Review recent network activity for suspicious outbound connectionsInspect network logs, proxy logs, or audit trails for outbound connections from the agent process to unknown or external hosts that could indicate key exfiltrationAffected if There are outbound connections from the agent to hosts other than the intended Elasticsearch endpoint
You are affected if strands-agents-tools version is below 0.7.0, the elasticsearch_memory tool is enabled, and the ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable is set with a valid credential.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to strands-agents-tools version 0.7.0 or later to fix the SSRF vulnerability. As a precautionary measure, rotate the ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY credential even if no compromise is indicated.
strands-agents-tools version 0.7.0
- Check your currently installed version of strands-agents-tools by running: pip show strands-agents-tools
- Upgrade to version 0.7.0 or later using: pip install --upgrade strands-agents-tools>=0.7.0
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running: pip show strands-agents-tools and confirming the version number
- As a precautionary measure, rotate your ELASTICSEARCH_API_KEY environment variable credential even if there is no indication of exposure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15746 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15746 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data