CVE-2026-15764
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Ozone in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 150.0.7871.125 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
In the news
Third-party coverage- Firefox, Chrome, Adobe, and VMware Updates Fix Multiple Critical ...
- Critical Vulnerabilities Patched With Fresh Chrome 150, Firefox 152 ...
- The Hacker News | #1 Trusted Source for Cybersecurity News — Index Page
- browser security — Latest News, Reports & Analysis
- remote code execution — Latest News, Reports & Analysis
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in Google's Ozone platform layer on Linux Chrome allows remote attackers to corrupt heap memory through specific UI gesture interactions, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution via malicious HTML pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 150.0.7871.125CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Google Chrome is installed on LinuxRun 'google-chrome --version' or 'chrome --version' in terminal, or check /usr/bin/google-chrome existsAffected if Google Chrome browser is installed on the Linux system
-
Verify the installed Chrome version numberExecute 'google-chrome --version' to get the exact version string (e.g., 150.0.7871.0 or 149.0.1234.56)Affected if The version shown is lower than 150.0.7871.125 (the version is displayed as three dot-separated numbers)
-
Confirm Chrome is running on Linux with Ozone platform layerNavigate to chrome://version in the browser and check the 'Command Line' or 'Platform' field; all modern Chrome on Linux uses the Ozone platform layer by defaultAffected if Chrome is running on a Linux kernel with the Ozone platform layer enabled (default for Chrome on Linux)
-
Check for UI gesture handling componentsThis vulnerability requires specific UI gesture interactions; no manual config check is needed - the flaw exists in the UI gesture handling code within the Ozone layerAffected if The browser processes any UI gestures through the Ozone platform layer (standard operation on Linux Chrome)
A user is affected if they run Google Chrome on Linux with a version lower than 150.0.7871.125, as the use-after-free vulnerability in the Ozone platform layer UI gesture handling can be triggered by malicious HTML pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped150.0.7871.125
Update Google Chrome for Linux to version 150.0.7871.125 or later; until patched, avoid interacting with untrusted HTML content and restrict browser usage in high-risk environments.
Chrome 150.0.7871.125 or later
- Ensure Google Chrome is not currently running
- Verify the current Chrome version by navigating to chrome://settings/help
- Download Chrome version 150.0.7871.125 or later from the official Chrome download page (google.com/chrome)
- Install the updated Chrome version
- Restart Chrome to complete the update
- Verify the version has been updated to 150.0.7871.125 or later via chrome://settings/help
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-15764 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-15764 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data