CVE-2026-1593
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Society Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/edit_expenses_query.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument detail can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Society Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the 'detail' parameter in /admin/edit_expenses_query.php. The vulnerability stems from unsanitized user input being directly incorporated into SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Society Management System is installedSearch the web root for directories containing 'society' or check common web server directories for the application files. Look for files matching the application's typical structure.Affected if The application is present on the server
-
Check the application versionExamine any version files, README files, or meta information in the application root directory for version number '1.0'. Check admin/about or readme files if they exist.Affected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileNavigate to the /admin/ directory and verify the presence of edit_expenses_query.php. This file should exist in the application structure.Affected if The file /admin/edit_expenses_query.php exists on the server
-
Verify admin interface accessibilityConfirm the /admin/ path is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS. Check if the admin panel can be reached without authentication or with valid credentials.Affected if The admin panel at /admin/ is accessible
-
Inspect the vulnerable parameter handlingReview the source code of edit_expenses_query.php and locate the 'detail' parameter usage. Look for SQL queries that incorporate this parameter without prepared statements or input sanitization.Affected if The 'detail' parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterization or sanitization
A user is affected if they have Society Management System version 1.0 installed with the /admin/edit_expenses_query.php file present and the admin interface accessible, where the 'detail' parameter handling lacks parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations, apply input validation, and ensure database accounts use least privilege. Since exploits are publicly available, prioritize immediate remediation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1593 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1593 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data