Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2026-1636

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A potential DLL hijacking vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Service Bridge that, under certain conditions, could allow a local authenticated user to execute code with elevated privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Lenovo Service Bridge contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability where the application loads dynamic link libraries from insecure locations or without proper path validation. A local authenticated attacker can place a malicious DLL in a location from which the application loads libraries, achieving code execution with elevated privileges.

MitigationImplement secure DLL loading by specifying full paths to DLLs, using safe DLL search mode settings, and validating DLL signatures before loading. Remove world-writable directories from the DLL search path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Lenovo Service Bridge is installed
    Open Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or check common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Lenovo\Service Bridge or C:\Program Files (x86)\Lenovo\Service Bridge for the presence of the Lenovo Service Bridge application folder.
    Affected if The application is installed on the system.
  2. Identify installed Lenovo Service Bridge version
    Right-click the Lenovo Service Bridge executable (typically ServiceBridge.exe) in the installation folder, select Properties, and view the File Version on the Details tab. Alternatively, run 'wmic product get name,version' or check the uninstall registry key at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for Lenovo Service Bridge entries.
    Affected if The installed version matches the affected version range for this vulnerability.
  3. Verify application runs with elevated privileges
    Open Task Manager, locate the ServiceBridge.exe process, right-click and select 'Run as administrator' was used, or check if the process shows 'Running as administrator' in the Details tab. Also examine if the application has UAC elevation prompts or runs from a protected system directory.
    Affected if The application executes with elevated or administrative privileges.
  4. Inspect DLL search path for insecure locations
    Use Process Monitor (procmon.exe) from Sysinternals to filter by Process Name ServiceBridge.exe and observe the 'Load Image' operations. Look for DLL loads from user-writable directories such as the application directory, TEMP folders, or directories with weak ACLs allowing authenticated users to write files.
    Affected if The application loads DLLs from directories writable by low-privilege users or does not use fully qualified paths for DLL loading.

A user is affected if Lenovo Service Bridge is installed and the application loads DLLs from insecure or user-writable locations while running with elevated privileges, allowing a local authenticated attacker to place a malicious DLL for code execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement secure DLL loading by specifying full paths to DLLs, using safe DLL search mode settings, and validating DLL signatures before loading. Remove world-writable directories from the DLL search path.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1636 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1636 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data