CVE-2026-1698
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA HTTP Host header attack vulnerability affects WebClient and the WebScheduler web apps of PcVue in version 15.0.0 through 16.3.3 included, allowing a remote attacker to inject harmful payloads that manipulate server-side behavior. This vulnerability only affects the endpoints /Authentication/ExternalLogin, /Authentication/AuthorizationCodeCallback and /Authentication/Logout of the WebClient and WebScheduler web apps.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHTTP Host header injection vulnerability in PcVue's WebClient and WebScheduler web applications (versions 15.0.0-16.3.3) allows remote attackers to inject malicious payloads via the Host header, affecting the /Authentication/ExternalLogin, /Authentication/AuthorizationCodeCallback, and /Authentication/Logout endpoints. This can manipulate server-side behavior for authentication-related operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.0.0, <= 15.2.13>= 16.0.0, < 16.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm PcVue installation and versionLocate the installed PcVue software and determine its version number. Check the application directory, registry entries, or the About dialog within PcVue. Compare the version against the affected ranges: 15.0.0-15.2.13 or 16.0.0-16.3.3Affected if The installed version falls within 15.0.0 through 15.2.13, or 16.0.0 through 16.3.3
-
Verify WebClient or WebScheduler are deployedCheck if the PcVue WebClient or WebScheduler web applications are installed and running. Inspect the web server (IIS) configuration or application directory for these web componentsAffected if WebClient or WebScheduler web applications are present on the server
-
Check if authentication endpoints are exposedInspect the web server to confirm the /Authentication/ExternalLogin, /Authentication/AuthorizationCodeCallback, and /Authentication/Logout endpoints are accessibleAffected if Any of the three affected endpoints are publicly or internally accessible
-
Determine if external authentication is in useReview the web application configuration files or authentication settings to check if external login providers (such as OAuth or SAML) are configured for the web clientAffected if External authentication providers are enabled or configured for the application
A user is affected if PcVue version is between 15.0.0-15.2.13 or 16.0.0-16.3.3 AND the WebClient or WebScheduler web components are running with accessible authentication endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.3.4
Upgrade PcVue to version 16.3.4 or later to obtain the vendor patch; alternatively, implement a web application firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy to validate and reject malformed Host headers before they reach the application.
PcVue 16.3.4 or later (for version 16.x line); for version 15.x, upgrade to the 16.x line at 16.3.4 or later
- Identify the currently installed PcVue version by checking the application or system information
- Download PcVue version 16.3.4 or later from the official vendor website (www.pcvue.com)
- Backup the current PcVue installation and configuration files before upgrading
- Install the upgraded version (16.3.4 or later) following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
- Verify that the WebClient and WebScheduler applications are functioning correctly after upgrade
- Test the affected endpoints (/Authentication/ExternalLogin, /Authentication/AuthorizationCodeCallback, /Authentication/Logout) to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1698 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data