CVE-2026-1775
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Labkotec LID-3300IP has an existing vulnerability in the ice detector software that enables an unauthenticated attacker to alter device parameters and run operational commands when specially crafted packets are sent to the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Labkotec LID-3300IP ice detector contains an authentication bypass vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to modify device parameters and execute operational commands by sending specially crafted network packets to the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device modelAccess the device web interface or check network discovery to identify if the device is a Labkotec LID-3300IP ice detector. Look for the device hostname, model number in the web UI, or SNMP sysDescr.Affected if The device is a Labkotec LID-3300IP ice detector
-
Check firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to the About or System Information page to retrieve the firmware version. Compare against any vendor release notes.Affected if Firmware version cannot be verified as patched or is older than vendor patches
-
Test for unauthenticated parameter accessSend an HTTP request to the device API endpoints (commonly /config or /setparam) without providing any authentication credentials. Use a tool like curl: curl -X POST http://<device-ip>/setparam -d 'param=value'Affected if The device accepts and processes parameter modification requests without returning an authentication error
-
Test for unauthenticated command executionSend a crafted request to operational command endpoints (such as /command or /execute) without authentication headers or session cookies.Affected if The device executes operational commands without requiring valid authentication
-
Verify network exposureCheck if the device is directly accessible from untrusted networks or the internet. Review firewall rules and network segmentation around the device IP address.Affected if Device is accessible from networks outside the trusted management segment
If the device is a Labkotec LID-3300IP and accepts parameter modifications or command execution without authentication credentials, the environment is affected by CVE-2026-1775.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate the device on a restricted network segment with firewall rules limiting access to authorized management systems, and contact the vendor for a firmware patch that implements proper authentication.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1775 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1775 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data