CVE-2026-1927
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Greenshift – animation and page builder blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the greenshift_app_pass_validation() function in all versions up to, and including, 12.6. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve global plugin settings including stored AI API keys and modify plugin settings, including the injection of arbitrary web scripts via the 'custom_css' value (stored XSS). NOTE: This vulnerability was partially patched in version 12.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Greenshift WordPress plugin has a missing capability check on the greenshift_app_pass_validation() function, allowing authenticated users with Subscriber-level access to retrieve global plugin settings including stored AI API keys and modify settings, including injecting stored XSS via the custom_css value.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Greenshift plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Greenshift' or check the plugin files in /wp-content/plugins/greenshift-animation-and-design-library/ for version information in the main PHP file headerAffected if Greenshift plugin is installed and the version has the vulnerable function without capability checks
-
Identify installed Greenshift versionOpen the main plugin file (e.g., greenshift-animation-and-design-library.php) and locate the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block, or query the WordPress database: SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name LIKE '%greenshift%version%'Affected if Version is unknown or falls within a range where greenshift_app_pass_validation() lacks capability checks
-
Locate the vulnerable function in plugin codeSearch the plugin directory for the function 'greenshift_app_pass_validation' using grep or a file search: grep -r 'greenshift_app_pass_validation' /path/to/wp-content/plugins/greenshift-animation-and-design-library/Affected if The function exists and does not contain current_user_can() or a capability check before executing sensitive operations
-
Check for Subscriber-level user accountsIn WordPress admin, go to Users > All Users and review the role column for any accounts assigned the Subscriber role, or query: SELECT user_id, meta_value FROM wp_usermeta WHERE meta_key = 'wp_capabilities' AND meta_value LIKE '%subscriber%'Affected if Any Subscriber-level accounts exist in the WordPress installation
-
Inspect Greenshift plugin settings for modified valuesNavigate to Greenshift plugin settings pages in WordPress admin, or query the wp_options table for greenshift-related settings, specifically examining the custom_css field for suspicious JavaScript or script tagsAffected if Settings contain unexpected custom_css values with injected script tags or AI API keys are exposed in settings that should be restricted
A user is affected if the Greenshift plugin is installed with a version containing the unguarded greenshift_app_pass_validation function and Subscriber-level user accounts exist with access to trigger the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest plugin version and rotate any exposed AI API keys. Review user roles and permissions to ensure Subscriber-level accounts have appropriate access controls.
Latest version after 12.6 (confirm fixed version via WordPress plugin repository release notes)
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard with administrator privileges.
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins.
- 3. Locate the 'Greenshift – animation and page builder blocks' plugin.
- 4. Check the current installed version (should be 12.6 or earlier based on the vulnerability report).
- 5. Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually download the latest version from the WordPress plugin repository.
- 6. After updating, verify the greenshift_app_pass_validation() function now includes proper capability checks (e.g., current_user_can('manage_options')).
- 7. Review and rotate any AI API keys that may have been exposed, as they could have been accessed during any prior exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1927 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1927 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data