CVE-2026-1993
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe ExactMetrics – Google Analytics Dashboard for WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Improper Privilege Management in versions 7.1.0 through 9.0.2. This is due to the `update_settings()` function accepting arbitrary plugin setting names without a whitelist of allowed settings. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with the `exactmetrics_save_settings` capability to modify any plugin setting, including the `save_settings` option that controls which user roles have access to plugin functionality. The admin intended to delegate configuration access to a trusted user, not enable that user to delegate access to everyone. By setting `save_settings` to include `subscriber`, an attacker can grant plugin administrative access to all subscribers on the site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ExactMetrics WordPress plugin versions 7.1.0-9.0.2 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability in the `update_settings()` function, which lacks a whitelist for allowed settings. Authenticated users with the `exactmetrics_save_settings` capability can modify any plugin setting, including the `save_settings` option that controls which user roles have access to plugin functionality, enabling privilege escalation by granting subscriber-level users administrative plugin access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ExactMetrics plugin is installedIn the WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for ExactMetrics (or ExactMetrics Lite). Note the installed version number displayed.Affected if ExactMetrics plugin is installed and version is 7.1.0 through 9.0.2 inclusive
-
Verify the installed version against affected rangeCompare the installed version number you found. The affected range is 7.1.0 through 9.0.2. Versions prior to 7.1.0 and versions 9.0.3 and later are not vulnerable.Affected if Installed version falls between 7.1.0 and 9.0.2 inclusive
-
Check which user roles have the exactmetrics_save_settings capabilityQuery the WordPress database or use a role/capability inspection plugin to determine which roles or users possess the 'exactmetrics_save_settings' capability. Look particularly for whether subscriber-level or contributor-level accounts have this capability.Affected if Non-administrator roles (such as subscriber, contributor, or author) have been granted the exactmetrics_save_settings capability, or the capability has been assigned to low-privilege user accounts
-
Inspect the save_settings configuration valueExamine the ExactMetrics plugin settings in the WordPress database (wp_options table, look for option_name containing 'exactmetrics_settings' or 'save_settings') or through the plugin settings UI. Check what roles are permitted access in the save_settings configuration.Affected if The save_settings configuration has been modified to include subscriber, contributor, or author roles, indicating the privilege escalation has been exploited
A user is affected if they have ExactMetrics version 7.1.0-9.0.2 installed AND the exactmetrics_save_settings capability or the save_settings configuration has been granted to non-administrator user roles.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to ExactMetrics version 9.0.3 or later which implements a whitelist for allowed settings. Until patched, strictly limit the `exactmetrics_save_settings` capability to only the most trusted administrators.
Version 9.0.3 or later (upgrade to latest stable release)
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate ExactMetrics – Google Analytics Dashboard for WordPress
- If the current version is 7.1.0 through 9.0.2, click Update Now to upgrade to the latest available version
- Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/exactmetrics/ and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- After updating, verify the new version number in the Plugins list
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1993 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1993 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data