Infinite LoopWeakness · CWE-835

CVE-2026-20054

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 VBA feature that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to crash.  This vulnerability is due to improper error checking when decompressing VBA data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted VBA data to the Snort 3 Detection Engine on the targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to enter an infinite loop, causing a DoS condition.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a denial of service vulnerability in Snort 3's VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) detection feature. The vulnerability stems from improper error checking during VBA data decompression, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to send crafted VBA data that causes the Snort 3 Detection Engine to enter an infinite loop.

MitigationApply vendor patches from Cisco for affected products. Consider disabling VBA inspection in Snort 3 if not required, or implement network-level filtering to block suspicious VBA content until patches are available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Snort 3 installation
    Run 'snort3 --version' or check for snort3 binary presence in /usr/local/bin/snort3, /usr/sbin/snort3, or similar paths
    Affected if Snort 3 is not installed on the system
  2. Identify Snort 3 version
    Execute 'snort3 --version' and note the full version string; compare against any known affected version ranges from Cisco advisories
    Affected if The installed version falls within the affected range and VBA inspection is enabled
  3. Locate Snort 3 configuration file
    Find snort.lua or snort.conf in /etc/snort/, /usr/local/etc/snort/, or the directory specified via --config option at startup
    Affected if No configuration file is found - unable to verify VBA inspection status
  4. Check if VBA inspection is enabled
    Search the snort.lua or snort.conf file for 'vba' or 'vbcript' or 'visual_basic' inspection module settings; also check for related preprocessor rules like 'inspect_vba' or 'vba_inspect'
    Affected if VBA/VBscript inspection is explicitly enabled in the configuration (vba_inspect or similar module is loaded and active)
  5. Verify activeBindings or policy configuration
    Check if the policy that loads the VBA inspection module is referenced in the activeBindings list in snort.lua, or if the --lua-script arguments at runtime include VBA-related scripts
    Affected if The VBA inspection module is bound to an active inspection policy

The environment is affected only if Snort 3 is installed with a vulnerable version AND VBA/VBscript inspection is explicitly enabled in the Snort configuration or runtime parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches from Cisco for affected products. Consider disabling VBA inspection in Snort 3 if not required, or implement network-level filtering to block suspicious VBA content until patches are available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20054 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data