CVE-2026-20067
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart, resulting in an interruption of packet inspection. This vulnerability is due to incomplete error checking when parsing the Multicast DNS fields of the HTTP header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an established connection to be parsed by Snort 3. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition when the Snort 3 Detection Engine unexpectedly restarts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability exists in the Snort 3 detection engine used by multiple Cisco products. The flaw stems from incomplete error checking during parsing of Multicast DNS (mDNS) fields embedded in HTTP headers. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted HTTP packets through an established connection containing malformed mDNS data, triggering an unexpected restart of the Snort 3 detection engine, resulting in denial of packet inspection services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0-233, < 3.9.5.0= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.0.4= 3.0.5= 3.0.6= 3.1.0= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 7.0.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.1= 7.0.1.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.2.1= 7.0.3= 7.0.4= 7.0.5= 7.0.6= 7.0.6.1= 7.0.6.2= 17.2.1r= 17.3.1a= 17.3.2= 17.3.3= 17.3.4= 17.3.4a= 17.3.5= 17.3.6= 17.3.7= 17.3.8= 17.3.8a= 17.4.1aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Snort 3 installation and versionRun 'snort3 -V' or check the installed package version via system package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l | grep snort', 'rpm -qa | grep snort', or 'snort --version'). Compare the version number against any available Snort 3 release notes for CVE-2026-20067 fixes.Affected if Snort 3 version is present but lacks the patch for this CVE (version prior to fix release)
-
Verify HTTP preprocessor/inspector is enabledExamine Snort 3 configuration file (typically snort.lua or snort.conf) for 'http_inspect' or 'http' inspector being loaded and active. Search for lines containing 'http_inspect' or 'http' in the http section.Affected if HTTP inspection is enabled, as the vulnerability is triggered via malformed mDNS data in HTTP headers
-
Confirm mDNS parsing within HTTP traffic inspection is activeIn the Snort 3 config, check if mDNS-related inspection is configured within the HTTP inspector or if there are any mDNS-related settings enabled. Look for 'mdns' keywords in the configuration file and examine http inspector parameters.Affected if mDNS fields are being parsed or inspected within HTTP traffic context, enabling the attack vector
-
Check for traffic inspection on established connectionsVerify that Snort 3 is actively inspecting HTTP traffic flows. Review inline/IPS mode configuration and ensure stream tracking is enabled. This can be confirmed via 'snort -c <config> --lua-list' to list loaded modules or by reviewing the running configuration.Affected if Snort 3 is inline and actively inspecting HTTP traffic on established connections, allowing the crafted packets to reach the vulnerable code path
Environment is affected if running a Snort 3 version lacking the CVE-2026-20067 patch while HTTP inspection with mDNS parsing in HTTP headers is enabled and actively processing traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.9.5.0
Apply Cisco-supplied patches or updates to the Snort 3 detection engine for affected products. As an interim network-level workaround, consider filtering or blocking HTTP traffic containing unexpected mDNS字段 until the patch can be deployed.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20067 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20067 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data