CVE-2026-20068
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart, resulting in an interruption of packet inspection. This vulnerability is due to incomplete error checking when parsing remote procedure call (RPC) data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted RPC packets through an established connection to be parsed by Snort 3. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition when the Snort 3 Detection Engine unexpectedly restarts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Cisco's Snort 3 detection engine caused by incomplete error handling when parsing malformed Remote Procedure Call (RPC) packets. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted RPC packets through an established connection, triggering an unexpected restart of the Snort 3 detection engine and interrupting packet inspection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0-233, < 3.9.2.0= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.0.4= 3.0.5= 3.0.6= 3.1.0= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 7.2.4= 7.2.4.1= 7.2.5= 7.2.5.1= 7.2.5.2= 7.2.6= 7.2.7= 7.2.8= 7.2.8.1= 7.2.9= 7.2.10= 7.2.10.2= 17.2.1r= 17.3.1a= 17.3.2= 17.3.3= 17.3.4= 17.3.4a= 17.3.5= 17.3.6= 17.3.7= 17.3.8= 17.3.8a= 17.4.1aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Snort 3 installation and versionRun 'snort -V' or 'snort3 -V' to display the installed Snort version. Check your package manager for installed snort3 packages.Affected if The installed version matches any version reported as affected in Cisco security advisories for this CVE.
-
Verify RPC protocol inspection is enabledExamine the Snort 3 configuration file (typically snort.lua or snort.conf) for 'rpc' or 'rpc_decode' preprocessor settings. Look for 'ips' or 'bindings' rules that enable RPC protocol inspection.Affected if RPC protocol inspection is enabled in the Snort 3 configuration, making the parser vulnerable to malformed packets.
-
Check for unexpected Snort engine restartsReview system logs (syslog, /var/log/snort/, or journalctl) for messages indicating snort3 process termination or detection engine restarts without an intentional service restart.Affected if Logs show repeated or unexplained Snort 3 detection engine restarts that correlate with RPC traffic processing.
-
Assess network exposure to RPC trafficDetermine whether Snort 3 is inspecting traffic on network segments where untrusted or external RPC packets could reach the Snort sensor (especially ports 111, 2049, or other RPC service ports).Affected if Snort 3 is deployed to inspect traffic from untrusted networks where an attacker could inject malformed RPC packets.
A user is affected if they run Snort 3 with RPC protocol inspection enabled on a network segment exposed to untrusted traffic, and they observe unexplained detection engine restarts or their version matches the affected range when published.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.9.2.0
Apply available Cisco security patches for affected products. Until patches are available, consider network-level filtering of suspicious RPC traffic and monitor for unexpected Snort restarts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20068 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20068 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data