Unity ConnectionApplication · Cisco

CVE-2026-20078

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 12.5 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unity Connection could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to download arbitrary files from an affected system. To exploit these vulnerabilities, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials.  These vulnerabilities are due to improper sanitization of user input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a crafted HTTPS request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to download arbitrary files from an affected system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco Unity Connection contains multiple path traversal vulnerabilities in its web-based management interface. Authenticated attackers with valid administrative credentials can send crafted HTTPS requests containing unsanitized user input to download arbitrary files from the underlying filesystem. The CVSS 6.5 indicates a medium-severity issue requiring authentication but allowing broad file disclosure.

MitigationApply the vendor-provided security updates/patches from Cisco for Unity Connection. Until patched, limit administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for suspicious HTTPS requests to the management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unity ConnectionApplication
Affected:<= 12.5= 14.0= 14su1= 14su2= 14su3= 14su3a= 14su4= 14su5= 15.0= 15su1= 15su2= 15su3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco Unity Connection is installed
    Locate the Cisco Unity Connection installation on your system or check the product list of network appliances managed by your organization.
    Affected if The product is present in your environment.
  2. Determine the installed version of Cisco Unity Connection
    Use the product's administrative interface, CLI, or system information tools to retrieve the exact version number of Unity Connection.
    Affected if The version matches any of these: 12.5 or earlier, 14.0, 14su1, 14su2, 14su3, 14su3a, 14su4, 14su5, 15.0, 15su1, 15su2, or 15su3.
  3. Confirm the web-based management interface is accessible
    Verify that HTTPS access to the Unity Connection administration portal is enabled and reachable on the network.
    Affected if The web management interface is exposed and accessible.
  4. Verify administrative user accounts exist
    Check if administrative accounts with privileges to access the Unity Connection management interface are configured in the system.
    Affected if Valid administrative credentials can be used to authenticate to the web interface.

You are affected if Cisco Unity Connection is installed, the version matches any of the affected versions listed, the web management interface is accessible, and administrative accounts exist that could be used to send the malicious HTTPS requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 12.5
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-provided security updates/patches from Cisco for Unity Connection. Until patched, limit administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for suspicious HTTPS requests to the management interface.

Fix this in Unity Connection Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20078 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20078 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data