Out-of-bounds WriteWeakness · CWE-787

CVE-2026-20097

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IMC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with admin-level privileges to execute arbitrary code as the root user. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system as the root user. Cisco has assigned this vulnerability a SIR of High rather than Medium as the score indicates because additional security implications could occur when the attacker becomes root.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a command injection vulnerability in Cisco IMC's web-based management interface. An authenticated attacker with admin-level privileges can send crafted HTTP requests containing malicious input that is improperly validated, allowing arbitrary code execution as the root user on the underlying operating system.

MitigationApply Cisco's available patches for this vulnerability. Until patched, limit access to the IMC web interface to trusted administrators only and monitor for suspicious HTTP requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cisco IMC is accessible
    Attempt to access the IMC web interface HTTPS port (typically port 443 or 8443) on the target host. Check if the login page responds.
    Affected if The IMC web interface is reachable and responds to HTTP/HTTPS requests.
  2. Identify the IMC version
    Log into the IMC web interface and navigate to the Admin or Settings section to view the firmware/software version. Alternatively, use the CLI: 'show version' or 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <host> -U admin -P <pass> mc info'.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than the version Cisco has listed as patched for CVE-2026-20097.
  3. Verify admin-level accounts exist
    Check the IMC user database through the web interface under User Management or Administration > Users. Confirm that accounts with Administrator privileges are configured.
    Affected if At least one admin-level user account is enabled and functional.
  4. Confirm web-based management is enabled
    Review IMC settings to verify the web-based management interface is enabled (HTTP/HTTPS access). Check via CLI: 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <host> -U admin -P <pass> raw 0x32 0x76 0x01 0x00' or check web service status.
    Affected if The web interface service is running and accepting connections.
  5. Review HTTP request logs for suspicious patterns
    Examine IMC web server logs (typically stored in /var/log or accessible via the interface) for unusual or malformed HTTP requests, especially those containing shell metacharacters like ; | & $ ( ) or backticks.
    Affected if Logs show unexpected HTTP requests with potential command injection payloads.

A system is affected if it runs a Cisco IMC version lower than the patched version, has the web-based management interface enabled, and has admin-level users configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Cisco's available patches for this vulnerability. Until patched, limit access to the IMC web interface to trusted administrators only and monitor for suspicious HTTP requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20097 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20097 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data