CVE-2026-2012
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Student Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /ramonsys/facultyloading/index.php. This manipulation of the argument ID causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the itsourcecode Student Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via the ID parameter in the /ramonsys/facultyloading/index.php file. The lack of parameterized queries or input sanitization enables attackers to manipulate database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Student Management System installation and versionLocate the itsourcecode application files and check for version identifiers. Common locations include version.php files, readme.txt, or the main index.php header. The affected version is 1.0.Affected if The installed itsourcecode Student Management System version is 1.0
-
Verify presence of affected fileSearch for the file /ramonsys/facultyloading/index.php within the web application directory structure.Affected if The file /ramonsys/facultyloading/index.php exists in the web root
-
Determine if faculty loading module is accessibleAttempt to access the URL path /ramonsys/facultyloading/index.php via HTTP/HTTPS request to confirm the endpoint is reachable.Affected if The faculty loading endpoint responds to HTTP requests and accepts input
-
Check ID parameter behaviorSubmit an HTTP request to the faculty loading page with a test value in the ID parameter (e.g., ?ID=1) and observe whether the application processes the input without sanitization or uses direct SQL concatenation.Affected if The ID parameter accepts unsanitized user input and the application directly incorporates it into SQL queries
A user is affected if they are running itsourcecode Student Management System version 1.0 with the /ramonsys/facultyloading/index.php file accessible and the ID parameter accepting unsanitized input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database interactions, apply input validation and escaping, and consider deploying a WAF as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2012 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2012 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data