CVE-2026-20146
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform path traversal attacks on the underlying operating system to either read or delete arbitrary files. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access sensitive files or delete arbitrary files on the affected system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a path traversal vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC). An authenticated attacker with administrative credentials can exploit improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests to read or delete arbitrary files on the underlying operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.3.0= 3.3.0= 3.4.0= 3.5.0< 3.3.0= 3.3.0= 3.4.0= 3.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Cisco ISE versionAccess the admin console and navigate to Administration > System > Licensing, or run 'show version' from the CLI. Alternatively, check /opt/CSCOISE/version.txt or the installed package version via system packages.Affected if The installed version is less than 3.3.0, or equals 3.3.0, 3.4.0, or 3.5.0.
-
Determine installed ISE-PIC versionIf using ISE-PIC, check the version via the same methods: admin console, CLI 'show version', or system version file.Affected if The installed version is less than 3.3.0, or equals 3.3.0, 3.4.0, or 3.5.0.
-
Confirm admin HTTP interface is accessibleVerify that the ISE admin web interface (HTTPS on port 443 or 9060) is reachable. Check if port 443/9060 is listening via 'show ip http server status' in CLI or network scan.Affected if The admin interface is exposed and the version is in the affected range.
-
Review HTTP request logs for path traversal patternsInspect ISE logs in Administration > Troubleshooting > Logs > System Logs > webinterface logs, or check /opt/CSCOISE/logs/ folder for HTTP access logs. Search for patterns like '../' or encoded variations in request parameters.Affected if Suspicious path traversal requests are found in logs targeting arbitrary file paths.
The environment is affected if Cisco ISE or ISE-PIC is running a version equal to 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.5.0, or any version below 3.3.0, and the admin HTTP interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.3.0
Apply the relevant Cisco security patch or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in Cisco's official security advisory for CVE-2026-20146. Restrict administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for suspicious file access patterns.
Cisco ISE and ISE-PIC version 3.3.0 or later (3.4.0, 3.5.0 with patches)
- Identify current ISE or ISE-PIC version via Administration > System > Licensing > Software Version
- Download Cisco ISE version 3.3.0 or later from the Cisco Software Download center (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- Review Cisco ISE upgrade guide for prerequisites: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-3/upgrade_guide/b_ISE_Upgrade_33.html
- Back up the ISE configuration via Administration > System > Backup & Restore > Full Backup
- Perform upgrade in a maintenance window as upgrade causes service disruption
- After upgrade, verify the system is running the fixed version via Administration > System > Licensing
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20146 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20146 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data