RoomosOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2026-20156

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.32.6.0 / 11.39.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20156 are related to improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-119.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in Cisco RoomOS software (CWE-119) discovered through internal security review. Improper restriction of operations within memory buffer bounds allows potential remote code execution or denial of service.

MitigationApply the Cisco RoomOS software hardening update/patch to all affected devices as specified in Cisco's release notes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RoomosOperating system
Affected:< 11.32.6.0>= 26.0.1.2, < 26.5.2.2
Roomos CloudOperating system
Affected:< 11.39.1.1>= 26.0.1.2, < 26.7.1.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine RoomOS version
    Access the device administration interface or use the 'xCommand SystemUnit SoftwareVersion' command via the API/CLI to retrieve the currently installed RoomOS version
    Affected if The installed version is lower than the version listed in Cisco's security advisory for this CVE or is an unpatched release
  2. Verify device network exposure
    Check network configuration settings to determine if the RoomOS device has reachable management interfaces (HTTP/HTTPS, SSH, or SIP ports) from untrusted networks
    Affected if The device management interfaces are exposed to the internet or untrusted LAN segments without proper firewall controls
  3. Review system logs for anomalies
    Examine RoomOS system logs (via admin interface or 'xPreference Logging' commands) for unexpected processes, authentication failures, or memory-related errors occurring around the time frame of the CVE disclosure
    Affected if Logs contain buffer overflow error messages, unexpected service restarts, or indicators of exploitation attempts
  4. Check for unauthorized configuration changes
    Review device configuration settings via 'xConfiguration' commands or the admin interface for any unexpected modifications to security settings, user accounts, or network parameters
    Affected if Configuration shows unauthorized changes or the device exhibits unexpected behavior such as spontaneous reboots or service degradation

A user is affected if their RoomOS version predates the patch release and the device is network-accessible to potential attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.32.6.0 / 11.39.1.1 / 26.5.2.2 or later
Fixed in 11.32.6.011.39.1.126.5.2.2
Interim mitigation

Apply the Cisco RoomOS software hardening update/patch to all affected devices as specified in Cisco's release notes.

Fix this in Roomos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20156 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20156 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data