CVE-2026-20205
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk MCP Server app versions below 1.0.3 , a user who holds a role with access to the Splunk `_internal` index or possesses the high-privilege capability `mcp_tool_admin` could view users session and authorization tokens in clear text.<br><br>The vulnerability would require either local access to the log files or administrative access to internal indexes, which by default only the admin role receives. <br><br>Review roles and capabilities on your instance and restrict internal index access to administrator-level roles. See [Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities](https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/latest/Security/Rolesandcapabilities) and [Connecting to MCP Server and Admin settings](https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/mcp-server-for-splunk-platform/connecting-to-mcp-server-and-admin-settings) in the Splunk documentation for more information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSplunk MCP Server versions below 1.0.3 expose session and authorization tokens in clear text within log files accessible through the `_internal` index. Users with the `mcp_tool_admin` capability or roles permitting access to the `_internal` index can read these sensitive tokens.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Splunk MCP Server installation and versionLocate the Splunk MCP Server app or add-on in your Splunk deployment and retrieve its version number. Compare this version against the affected range (versions below 1.0.3).Affected if The installed version of Splunk MCP Server is below 1.0.3.
-
Verify access to the _internal indexReview role configurations and search permissions to determine which users or roles have access to the _internal index. Check if any non-administrator roles permit searching this index.Affected if Non-admin users or roles have permission to search the _internal index.
-
Identify users with mcp_tool_admin capabilityInspect user roles and capabilities within Splunk to determine which users possess the mcp_tool_admin capability. Review role definitions to see if this capability is assigned to non-administrator roles.Affected if Any user without administrator privileges holds the mcp_tool_admin capability.
-
Search _internal logs for exposed tokensRun a search against the _internal index using keywords such as 'session', 'token', 'authorization', or 'bearer' to locate any clear-text credentials in log entries. Review the results for exposed authentication tokens.Affected if Clear-text session or authorization tokens appear in logs within the _internal index.
Your environment is affected if Splunk MCP Server version is below 1.0.3 AND (non-admin users can access the _internal index OR users hold the mcp_tool_admin capability), resulting in token exposure in logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict access to the `_internal` index to only administrator-level roles and review/remove the `mcp_tool_admin` capability from non-admin users to prevent token exposure.
Splunk MCP Server version 1.0.3
- Identify the current version of the Splunk MCP Server app installed on your instance
- Upgrade the Splunk MCP Server app to version 1.0.3 or later
- Review user roles and capabilities to ensure only administrator-level roles have access to the _internal index
- If needed, restrict the _internal index access to admin roles only by modifying role configurations
- Verify that session and authorization tokens are no longer being logged in clear text after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20205 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20205 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data