CVE-2026-20238
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 5.7.3, a low-privileged user that does not hold the 'admin' or 'power' roles could access confidential data that was restricted through `srchFilter` configurations on custom roles.<br><br>The app contains an `authorize.conf` configuration file with a `srchFilter` entry that modifies the built-in ‘user’ role. Because the Splunk platform combines inherited search filters with the `OR` SPL operator, the injected filter overrides more restrictive filters on child roles.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 5.7.3, the authorize.conf configuration file contains a srchFilter entry that modifies the built-in 'user' role. When Splunk combines inherited search filters using the OR operator, the injected filter overrides more restrictive srchFilter configurations on child roles. This allows low-privileged users without admin or power roles to bypass role-based access controls and access confidential data that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.7.0, < 5.7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Splunk AI Toolkit versionLocate the Splunk AI Toolkit app (usually in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/ai_toolkit/) and read the default/app.conf file to find the version number in the [launcher] sectionAffected if The version is 5.7.0, 5.7.1, or 5.7.2 (versions >= 5.7.0 and < 5.7.3)
-
Locate authorize.conf in AI ToolkitFind the authorize.conf file within the Splunk AI Toolkit directory, typically at $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/apps/ai_toolkit/default/authorize.confAffected if The authorize.conf file exists in the AI Toolkit directory
-
Examine srchFilter entries for the user roleOpen the authorize.conf file and search for any [role_user] stanza containing an srchFilter settingAffected if An srchFilter entry exists under the [role_user] stanza in the AI Toolkit's authorize.conf
-
Identify custom roles with restrictive srchFiltersCheck all authorize.conf files (both default and local) for custom roles that inherit from user and contain srchFilter settings with more restrictive conditions (such as index=restricted or index=confidential)Affected if Custom child roles exist with srchFilter settings that would be overridden by the less-restrictive AI Toolkit filter due to OR combination behavior
A user is affected if Splunk AI Toolkit version 5.7.0-5.7.2 is installed and its authorize.conf contains an srchFilter entry that modifies the built-in 'user' role, potentially overriding more restrictive filters on child custom roles.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.7.3
Upgrade to Splunk AI Toolkit version 5.7.3 or later. After upgrading, review and verify that role-based search filter restrictions are properly enforced.
Splunk AI Toolkit 5.7.3
- 1. Identify the currently installed version of Splunk AI Toolkit in your Splunk environment
- 2. Download Splunk AI Toolkit version 5.7.3 or later from Splunkbase or the official Splunk repository
- 3. Upgrade the Splunk AI Toolkit app to version 5.7.3 or higher following standard Splunk app upgrade procedures
- 4. Restart the Splunk platform if required by the upgrade process
- 5. Verify that the upgrade was successful and test that the srchFilter authorization behavior is now correct for non-admin/non-power users
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20238 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20238 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data