CVE-2026-20430
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn wlan AP FW, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: WCNCR00467553; Issue ID: MSV-5151.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a firmware vulnerability in WLAN Access Point (AP) devices where an incorrect bounds check leads to an out-of-bounds write condition. The flaw allows a proximal/adjacent attacker (within Wi-Fi range) to achieve privilege escalation without requiring any user interaction or additional execution privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.6.7.3= 19.07.0= 21.02.0= 23.05.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is a WLAN Access PointIdentify if the target device is a Wi-Fi Access Point, wireless router, or AP controller. Check device documentation, web UI, or system information for device type classification.Affected if Device is not a WLAN AP - the vulnerability does not apply to non-Wi-Fi devices.
-
Identify the firmware base systemDetermine if the AP runs on Mediatek SDK or OpenWrt. Check the vendor documentation, firmware build information, or system logs for 'Mediatek', 'MTK', 'OpenWrt', or specific version strings.Affected if Firmware is neither Mediatek SDK nor OpenWrt - different base systems have different vulnerability status.
-
Check installed Mediatek SDK versionFor Mediatek-based APs, retrieve the SDK version from firmware release notes, system info page, or via command such as 'cat /proc/version' or 'logread' if accessible. Compare against <= 7.6.7.3.Affected if Mediatek SDK version is 7.6.7.3 or lower - falls within affected range.
-
Check installed OpenWrt versionFor OpenWrt-based APs, retrieve the version via 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'opkg list-installed'. Compare against exactly 19.07.0, 21.02.0, or 23.05.0.Affected if OpenWrt version matches 19.07.0, 21.02.0, or 23.05.0 exactly.
-
Verify WLAN radio is enabledConfirm the wireless interface is active. Check via 'iwconfig', 'wifi status', or through the AP management web UI wireless settings. The vulnerability requires WLAN functionality to be present.Affected if Wi-Fi radio is disabled and the AP operates in wired-only mode - attack surface is not present.
Device is affected if it is a WLAN AP running Mediatek SDK version 7.6.7.3 or lower, or OpenWrt version 19.07.0, 21.02.0, or 23.05.0, with the Wi-Fi radio enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch (WCNCR00467553) to affected WLAN AP firmware. Since exploitation is possible from adjacent network proximity, prioritize updating APs in high-security environments and ensure proper network segmentation to limit attacker proximity.
MediaTek SDK > 7.6.7.3 (or OpenWrt version after 23.05.0 with patched MediaTek firmware)
- 1. Identify the MediaTek WiFi device or OpenWrt firmware that uses the affected MediaTek SDK (<=7.6.7.3)
- 2. Check with MediaTek for the specific firmware version containing the WCNCR00467553 patch
- 3. For OpenWrt devices: Update to a newer OpenWrt release after 23.05.0 that incorporates the patched MediaTek firmware
- 4. For SDK users: Upgrade to MediaTek SDK version higher than 7.6.7.3 that includes the WCNCR00467553 fix
- 5. After updating firmware, verify the WiFi AP functionality and ensure the out-of-bounds write vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20430 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20430 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data