Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2026-20744

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The charging station's websocket endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing unauthenticated users to establish connections. This enables attackers to potentially escalate privileges by interacting with backend charging station management functions through the unsecured websocket channel.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and authorization controls on the websocket endpoint, such as token-based authentication, certificate validation, or OAuth, and enforce TLS encryption for all websocket communications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the charging station websocket endpoint
    Locate any websocket endpoints exposed by the charging station management interface. Check the application configuration, API documentation, or network listeners for paths such as /ws, /websocket, /charging/ws, or similar websocket URLs associated with the charging station service.
    Affected if A websocket endpoint exists and is accessible on the network without authentication requirements documented or configured.
  2. Verify websocket endpoint requires authentication
    Attempt to establish a websocket connection to the identified endpoint without providing any credentials, tokens, or session cookies. Observe whether the connection is accepted or rejected based on authentication challenges.
    Affected if The websocket connection is successfully established without requiring any form of authentication (token, certificate, session, or basic auth).
  3. Test authorization enforcement on websocket commands
    After establishing a websocket connection, send management commands (such as configuration changes, user privilege modifications, or firmware operations) without prior authentication. Verify if the backend accepts and executes these commands.
    Affected if The websocket accepts and processes privileged management commands without verifying user identity or permissions.
  4. Confirm TLS encryption is not required
    Check if the websocket endpoint is accessible only over wss:// (secure) or allows both ws:// and wss:// connections. Attempt connections over unencrypted ws:// and observe if they are accepted.
    Affected if The websocket endpoint accepts unencrypted ws:// connections or does not enforce TLS requirement.
  5. Inspect websocket security configuration
    Review the charging station application configuration files, server settings, or middleware logs for websocket security settings. Look for parameters related to authentication, authorization, or session validation on websocket upgrades.
    Affected if No authentication or authorization middleware is configured for the websocket endpoint.

The environment is affected if the charging station websocket endpoint accepts unauthenticated connections and allows privileged management operations without identity verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication and authorization controls on the websocket endpoint, such as token-based authentication, certificate validation, or OAuth, and enforce TLS encryption for all websocket communications.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20744 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20744 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data