CVE-2026-20924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Windows Management Services allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
- Microsoft January 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes 3 zero-days, 114 flaws
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability in Windows Management Services enables a local authenticated attacker to corrupt memory and elevate privileges to higher integrity levels by exploiting improper memory handling after objects are freed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.17763.8276< 10.0.19044.6809< 10.0.19045.6809< 10.0.22631.6491< 10.0.26100.7623< 10.0.26200.7623< 10.0.17763.8276< 10.0.20348.4648CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt and note the Build number displayedAffected if The build number falls below the version thresholds: 17763.8276 (1809/Server 2019), 19044.6809 (21h2), 19045.6809 (22h2), 22631.6491 (23h2), 26100.7623 (24h2), 26200.7623 (25h2), or 20348.4648 (Server 2022)
-
Verify Windows Management Instrumentation service statusRun 'sc query Winmgmt' from command prompt to check if the WMI service is runningAffected if The service state shows as RUNNING - the vulnerability only applies when this service is active
-
Confirm WMI repository integrityRun 'winmgmt /verifyrepository' to check for repository corruptionAffected if The repository reports as inconsistent or corrupted, which may indicate exploitation activity
-
Check for unexpected WMI consumer objectsRun 'Get-WmiObject -Namespace root\subscription -Class __EventConsumer' in PowerShell with admin rights to list WMI consumersAffected if Unknown or suspicious consumer objects exist that were not intentionally created
You are affected if your Windows build number is below the specified thresholds AND the Windows Management Instrumentation (Winmgmt) service is running on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.17763.827610.0.19044.680910.0.19045.6809
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows Management Services when released; until then, limit local user permissions and monitor for suspicious WMI/mgmt service activity.
Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8276+ | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6809+ | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6809+ | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.6491+ | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.7623+ | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.7623+ | Windows Server 2019: 10.0.17763.8276+ | Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.4648+
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'
- Determine which Windows version and build is installed (e.g., Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows Server 2022)
- For Windows 10 1809: Upgrade to build 10.0.17763.8276 or later via Windows Update or by installing KB5055523
- For Windows 10 21h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.19044.6809 or later via Windows Update or by installing KB5055539
- For Windows 10 22h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.19045.6809 or later via Windows Update or by installing KB5055540
- For Windows 11 23h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.22631.6491 or later via Windows Update or by installing KB5055525
- For Windows 11 24h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.7623 or later via Windows Update or by installing KB5055537
- For Windows 11 25h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.26200.7623 or later via Windows Update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data