CVE-2026-2093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDocpedia developed by Flowring has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDocpedia by Flowring contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified input vectors. The vulnerability permits reading sensitive database contents and likely enables further compromise depending on database permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Docpedia installationIdentify if Flowring Docpedia application is present on the system by checking for Docpedia-related directories, services, or web applications. Common locations may include web server document roots or application installation directories.Affected if Docpedia by Flowring is installed and running
-
Determine Docpedia versionLocate version information within the Docpedia installation - check configuration files, about pages, or metadata files that may contain version strings. Compare against any documented affected version ranges.Affected if The installed version falls within an affected but unpatched version range
-
Verify unauthenticated access is possibleDetermine if the Docpedia application is network-accessible without authentication. Check if login or authentication is required to access the application interfaces.Affected if Docpedia is exposed to network/users without requiring authentication
-
Identify database-connected interfacesReview which Docpedia features interact with the database. Focus on input fields, search functions, or parameters that could accept user-supplied data.Affected if Database-connected features are accessible without authentication and accept user input
-
Check for SQL injection exposureTest identified input vectors with benign SQL characters to observe application behavior. Look for database errors, unexpected responses, or timing differences that may indicate SQL injection susceptibility.Affected if User-supplied input is passed directly to database queries without apparent parameterization
The environment is affected if Docpedia by Flowring is installed and exposes unauthenticated database-connected interfaces that accept user input without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions, apply input validation and sanitization, and restrict database user privileges to minimum necessary operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data