CVE-2026-2094
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDocpedia developed by Flowring has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDocpedia by Flowring contains a SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. Since authentication is required, attackers likely need valid credentials to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is severe as attackers can read, modify, and delete database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Docpedia by Flowring is installedSearch the system for Docpedia components, web application files, or documentation referencing Flowring Docpedia. Check installed applications or web server document roots for the product.Affected if Docpedia by Flowring software is found on the system
-
Identify the installed Docpedia versionLocate version information in application files, configuration files, or the product's about/help section. Common locations include version files, manifest files, or the login page footer.Affected if The installed version falls within an affected range (any unpatched version of Docpedia) or the version cannot be determined
-
Verify authentication is required and accessibleCheck if the Docpedia login page is accessible and determine whether authentication enforcement is properly configured. Attempt to access protected resources without credentials.Affected if Authentication can be bypassed or default/weak credentials are in use, allowing unauthorized access
-
Confirm database interaction points existInspect application endpoints, parameters, and functions that interact with the database. Look for user-supplied input being used in SQL queries without apparent parameterization.Affected if The application accepts user input that is directly used in database queries without parameterized queries or input validation
-
Check for known vulnerable endpointsReview application logs, error messages, or documentation for SQL injection entry points. Test suspected parameters with safe SQL injection probes if authorized.Affected if Parameters accepting user input show potential SQL injection vectors or unexpected database behavior
A system is affected if Docpedia by Flowring is installed and authenticated users can submit input that gets incorporated into SQL queries without proper parameterization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions, apply strict input validation on all user-supplied parameters, and follow the principle of least privilege for database accounts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2094 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data