CVE-2026-21049
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds write in libpadm.so library prior to SMR Jul-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability exists in the libpadm.so library on Samsung devices running firmware versions prior to the July 2026 SMR release. The out-of-bounds write condition allows a local attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution, potentially granting privileged access to the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is a Samsung productCheck system properties: run 'getprop ro.product.brand' or 'getprop ro.manufacturer' and verify the output shows SamsungAffected if Device is not a Samsung product (this CVE affects only Samsung devices)
-
Check the Android security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to retrieve the installed security patch dateAffected if The security patch date is earlier than July 2026 (format typically shows as YYYY-MM-DD)
-
Check the Samsung SMR (Security Maintenance Release) versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.sem_platform' or check Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Security patch levelAffected if The SMR version is below the July-2026 release (compare to the Jul-2026 SMR baseline)
-
Verify libpadm.so library is present on the deviceCheck if the library exists by running 'ls -la /vendor/lib64/libpadm.so' or 'find / -name libpadm.so 2>/dev/null'Affected if The library file libpadm.so is present on the device (vulnerability resides in this library)
-
Confirm firmware build date is prior to July 2026Run 'getprop ro.build.date' or check the build number in Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Build numberAffected if Build date is before July 2026 (this indicates firmware predates the fix)
A Samsung device is affected if it has libpadm.so present AND its security patch level or SMR version is earlier than the July 2026 release.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the SMR Jul-2026 Release 1 or later firmware update to affected Samsung devices to patch the vulnerable libpadm.so library.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21049 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21049 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data