CVE-2026-21238
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver (AFD.sys), which handles WinSock network communications. The vulnerability involves improper access control that allows an authenticated local attacker to elevate their privileges to SYSTEM or administrative levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8868< 10.0.17763.8389< 10.0.19044.6937< 10.0.19045.6937< 10.0.22631.6649< 10.0.26100.7781< 10.0.26200.7781all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if The installed build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.8868 (Win10 1607), 17763.8389 (Win10 1809), 19044.6937 (Win10 21h2), 19045.6937 (Win10 22h2), 22631.6649 (Win11 23h2), 26100.7781 (Win11 24h2), 26200.7781 (Win11 25h2), or any Windows Server 2012 R2 version
-
Verify AFD.sys driver presenceCheck that AFD.sys exists on the system by running 'dir C:\Windows\System32\drivers\AFD.sys' in an elevated Command PromptAffected if The driver file exists (which is true on all standard Windows installations with networking) and the Windows version is in the affected range from step 1
-
Confirm user context for exploitationRecognize this is a local privilege escalation requiring an authenticated local user account. Check current user context with 'whoami' in Command PromptAffected if The system runs an affected Windows version AND accepts local user connections (standard configuration). The vulnerability is exploitable by any authenticated local user on the system.
The system is affected if it runs any Windows version with a build number lower than the fixed versions listed, as the vulnerable AFD.sys driver is present by default on affected Windows installations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.886810.0.17763.838910.0.19044.6937
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-21238 through Windows Update or manual patch deployment, as this is a driver-level vulnerability fixed by Microsoft.
Upgrade to the appropriate fixed build for your Windows version (e.g., Windows 10 22h2 build >= 10.0.19045.6937, Windows 11 24h2 >= 10.0.26100.7781)
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which version branch you're on (e.g., 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, or Windows Server 2012 R2)
- For Windows 10 1607: Upgrade to build 10.0.14393.8868 or later
- For Windows 10 1809: Upgrade to build 10.0.17763.8389 or later
- For Windows 10 21h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.19044.6937 or later
- For Windows 10 22h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.19045.6937 or later
- For Windows 11 23h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.22631.6649 or later
- For Windows 11 24h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.7781 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21238 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21238 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data