Webtransport GoApplication · Quic Go

CVE-2026-21438

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.10.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
webtransport-go is an implementation of the WebTransport protocol. Prior to 0.10.0, an attacker can cause unbounded memory consumption repeatedly creating and closing many WebTransport streams. Closed streams were not removed from an internal session map, preventing garbage collection of their resources. This vulnerability is fixed in v0.10.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In webtransport-go versions prior to 0.10.0, closed WebTransport streams were not removed from an internal session map, preventing garbage collection of their resources. An attacker can exploit this by repeatedly creating and closing many streams to cause unbounded memory consumption on the server.

MitigationUpgrade to webtransport-go v0.10.0 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement stream creation rate limiting and connection pooling to mitigate memory exhaustion while planning the upgrade.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Webtransport GoApplication
Affected:< 0.10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine the version of the webtransport-go library in your project
    Review your dependency management files (such as go.mod) or use Go tooling (e.g., go list -m all) to find the version of the webtransport-go library.
    Affected if The version is less than 0.10.0.
  2. Verify the library is handling WebTransport streams
    Inspect your application's source code to confirm whether the webtransport-go library is imported and used to handle WebTransport connections.
    Affected if The library is in use and the version is below 0.10.0.
  3. Monitor for unbounded memory growth (optional)
    Under controlled test conditions, repeatedly create and close WebTransport streams while monitoring the server's memory usage; if memory consumption grows continuously without release, it may indicate the vulnerability.
    Affected if Memory usage increases unboundedly during repeated stream creation and closure.

You are affected if your environment uses webtransport-go version lower than 0.10.0 to handle WebTransport streams.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.10.0 or later
Fixed in 0.10.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to webtransport-go v0.10.0 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement stream creation rate limiting and connection pooling to mitigate memory exhaustion while planning the upgrade.

Recommended fix High confidence

v0.10.0 or later

  1. Check the current version of webtransport-go in use (e.g., run `go list -m all` or check go.mod)
  2. Upgrade to version 0.10.0 or later by running `go get github.com/nhooyr.io/[email protected]` or later
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `go list -m all` to confirm the new version
  4. Rebuild and test the application to ensure compatibility

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Webtransport Go Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21438 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data