CVE-2026-21448
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBagisto is an open source laravel eCommerce platform. Versions prior to 2.3.10 are vulnerable to server-side template injection. When a normal customer orders any product, in the `add address` step they can inject a value to run in admin view. The issue can lead to remote code execution. Version 2.3.10 contains a patch.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBagisto versions before 2.3.10 suffer from a server-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability in the checkout address input field. When a customer places an order and adds an address, malicious template syntax can be injected that executes when rendered in the admin dashboard view. This stems from improper sanitization of user input before it is passed to the Laravel Blade template engine, enabling remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.3.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Bagisto versionCheck the composer.json file in the Bagisto root directory, or look for a version constant in config/app.php, or access the admin panel and check the system information pageAffected if The version number is lower than 2.3.10
-
Verify checkout address functionality existsNavigate to the storefront checkout page and confirm the address input fields are present and accessible to customersAffected if The checkout address form is enabled and functional (this is the default state)
-
Inspect admin address rendering codeLocate the admin view files that render customer addresses - typically in packages/Webkul/Admin/src/Resources/views/sales/addresses/ or similar paths. Check how address fields are passed to Blade templatesAffected if The address data is rendered directly in Blade templates without using raw output escaping (e.g., {{ $address }} instead of {{ $address }} with sanitization, or the code uses {!! $address !!})
-
Check address input sanitization in controllerExamine the controller handling checkout address submission (typically in packages/Webkul/Checkout/src/Http/Controllers). Look for input validation or sanitization before the address is saved to the databaseAffected if There is no input validation or sanitization applied to address fields before database storage, or sanitization is missing specific template syntax filtering
-
Test address field for SSTI in admin viewPlace a test order with a crafted address containing template syntax (e.g., {{ 7*7 }}). Then view this address in the admin panel. If the result renders as 49 instead of the literal string, the vulnerability is presentAffected if The expression evaluates and displays 49 in the admin dashboard, confirming template injection is possible
You are affected if your Bagisto installation is version 2.3.10 or lower and the checkout address fields render directly in admin views without proper input sanitization or output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.3.10
Upgrade to Bagisto version 2.3.10 or later which contains the patch. As an interim measure, input validation and output encoding should be applied to all address fields before rendering in admin views.
2.3.10
- Backup the current Bagisto installation and database before proceeding
- Confirm the current version is below 2.3.10 by checking composer.json or the admin panel
- Upgrade Bagisto to version 2.3.10 using composer update (e.g., composer update bagisto/bagisto:2.3.10 or by updating the version constraint in composer.json)
- Clear cached files (php artisan cache:clear, php artisan config:clear)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the admin panel
- Test that the address functionality works correctly in both customer and admin views
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21448 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21448 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data