CVE-2026-21661
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in JohnsonControls AC2000 on Windows allows Leveraging/Manipulating Configuration File Search Paths. This issue affects AC2000: from 10.6 before release 10, from 11.0 before release 9, from 12 before release 3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe AC2000 application on Windows uses a search path to locate configuration files, but does not properly control or validate this path. An attacker with local access can manipulate the search path or place malicious configuration files in locations the application searches, causing arbitrary code execution when the application loads these files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate AC2000 installationSearch for AC2000 installation directories (commonly in Program Files or Program Files (x86)) or check registry keys under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\ and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE for entries containing 'AC2000'Affected if AC2000 application is found on the system
-
Identify installed versionExamine the AC2000 executable (ac2000.exe or similar) right-click Properties > Details, or check version info in the program's installation directoryAffected if Version is 10.x below 10.6.10, 11.x below 11.0.9, or 12.x below 12.3
-
Determine configuration file search pathReview AC2000 documentation, configuration files, or application logs for settings that define where configuration files are loaded from; common locations include the application directory, user profile, or working directoryAffected if The application uses a configurable or relative search path to locate config files
-
Inspect search path directories for unauthorized config filesManually examine all directories in the search path for unexpected or recently created configuration files (XML, INI, CFG, or proprietary config formats) that do not belong to the legitimate AC2000 installationAffected if Unexpected configuration files are present in directories the application searches
-
Check filesystem permissions on search path directoriesRight-click each directory in the search path > Properties > Security tab, or run 'icacls [directory]' from command prompt to review which users and groups have Write or Modify permissionsAffected if Low-privilege users or untrusted accounts have Write access to directories in the search path
The system is affected if AC2000 version is below 10.6.10/11.0.9/12.3 AND the search path directories have weak permissions allowing unauthorized placement of configuration files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate AC2000 to the patched releases (10.6.10, 11.0.9, or 12.3 depending on version branch). Until patched, restrict filesystem permissions on directories in the search path and ensure the application runs from secure, controlled locations.
AC2000 10.6 to release 10, AC2000 11.0 to release 9, or AC2000 12 to release 3 (depending on your current major version)
- Identify the currently installed AC2000 version (10.6.x, 11.0.x, or 12.x)
- For AC2000 version 10.6.x: upgrade to release 10
- For AC2000 version 11.0.x: upgrade to release 9
- For AC2000 version 12.x: upgrade to release 3
- Obtain the appropriate updated installer from JohnsonControls official support channels
- Apply the upgrade following standard JohnsonControls installation procedures
- Verify the version has been correctly updated after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21661 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21661 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data