CVE-2026-21742
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to view cleartext password in response for Secure Message Exchange and Radius queries, if configured
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFortiSOAR versions 7.3-7.6 contain a cleartext transmission vulnerability where an authenticated attacker can view passwords in cleartext within API responses when querying Secure Message Exchange or RADIUS authentication configurations, exposing sensitive credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.3.0, < 7.5.3>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiSOAR versionLog into FortiSOAR admin console and navigate to Administration > About, or run 'fwconsole --version' via CLI to determine the installed version numberAffected if Version is 7.3.0 through 7.5.2, or 7.6.0 through 7.6.3 (versions below 7.5.3 or 7.6.4)
-
Identify Secure Message Exchange configurationNavigate to Administration > Connector Library or Settings > Integrations and look for Secure Message Exchange connector instances. Check if any instances are created and enabledAffected if Secure Message Exchange connector is configured with stored credentials
-
Identify RADIUS authentication configurationNavigate to Administration > Authentication > RADIUS or Settings > Authentication Methods to see if RADIUS authentication is enabled with saved credentialsAffected if RADIUS authentication is configured with stored shared secrets or passwords
-
Verify API response exposure (optional confirmation)Using an authenticated API client, query the Secure Message Exchange or RADIUS configuration endpoints (such as GET /api/connector/<id> or /api/authentication/radius) and inspect whether password fields return plaintext values instead of masked/encrypted valuesAffected if API responses return password values in plaintext rather than masked or encrypted format
User is affected if FortiSOAR version falls within 7.3.0-7.5.2 or 7.6.0-7.6.3 AND Secure Message Exchange or RADIUS authentication configurations with stored credentials are present in the environment
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.37.6.4
Upgrade FortiSOAR to vendor-patched versions and verify that Secure Message Exchange and RADIUS configurations are using encrypted communication channels.
FortiSOAR 7.5.3 or later; FortiSOAR 7.6.4 or later
- Identify the currently installed FortiSOAR version using the system dashboard or CLI
- Determine whether your current version falls within affected ranges: 7.3.0-7.5.2 or 7.6.0-7.6.3
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Back up the FortiSOAR database and configuration before proceeding
- Upgrade to FortiSOAR version 7.5.3 or higher (if on 7.3.x-7.5.x line)
- Upgrade to FortiSOAR version 7.6.4 or higher (if on 7.6.x line)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the system dashboard
- Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by testing Secure Message Exchange and Radius query responses
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21742 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21742 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data