RustfsApplication

CVE-2026-21862

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to version alpha.78, IP-based access control can be bypassed: get_condition_values trusts client-supplied X-Forwarded-For/X-Real-Ip without verifying a trusted proxy, so any reachable client can spoof aws:SourceIp and satisfy IP-allowlist policies. This issue has been patched in version alpha.78.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

RustFS versions prior to alpha.78 have an IP allowlist bypass vulnerability in the get_condition_values function. The system trusts client-supplied X-Forwarded-For and X-Real-Ip HTTP headers without verifying that the request was forwarded through a trusted reverse proxy, allowing any reachable attacker to spoof the aws:SourceIp condition and bypass IP-based access control policies.

MitigationUpgrade to RustFS version alpha.78 or implement proper trusted proxy verification (e.g., validate the source IP against a configured list of trusted proxies before trusting forwarded headers).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RustfsApplication
Affected:= 1.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify RustFS version
    Check the installed RustFS version using your package manager or cargo list rustfs. Compare the version against the affected range: versions prior to alpha.78.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than alpha.78
  2. Determine if IP-based access control is in use
    Review your RustFS configuration for any policies or rules that reference aws:SourceIp condition or IP allowlisting functionality.
    Affected if IP-based access control policies using aws:SourceIp are configured
  3. Verify if reverse proxy headers are being processed
    Inspect your RustFS or web server configuration to determine if X-Forwarded-For or X-Real-Ip headers from client requests are being read and trusted.
    Affected if The system processes X-Forwarded-For or X-Real-Ip headers from incoming requests without proxy verification
  4. Confirm reverse proxy is explicitly trusted
    Check whether RustFS or the frontend web server is configured to only trust forwarded headers from known, specific proxy IP addresses.
    Affected if There is no explicit configuration specifying which reverse proxies are trusted before accepting forwarded headers

You are affected if you run RustFS version earlier than alpha.78, use IP-based access control policies, and do not verify that X-Forwarded-For/X-Real-Ip headers originate from a trusted reverse proxy.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to RustFS version alpha.78 or implement proper trusted proxy verification (e.g., validate the source IP against a configured list of trusted proxies before trusting forwarded headers).

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

alpha.78

  1. Upgrade Rustfs from version 1.0.0 to version alpha.78 or later to obtain the security patch
  2. After upgrading, verify that IP-based access controls are working correctly by testing with spoofed X-Forwarded-For/X-Real-Ip headers
  3. Ensure that any reverse proxy (e.g., nginx, HAProxy) is properly configured to set trusted proxy headers, and that Rustfs is configured to trust only that proxy for IP validation

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Rustfs Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21862 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data