CVE-2026-21865
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDiscourse is an open source discussion platform. In versions prior to 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0, moderators can convert some personal messages to public topics when they shouldn't have access. This issue is patched in versions 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, and 2026.1.0. As a workaround, site admin can temporarily revoke the moderation role from untrusted moderators or remove the moderator group from the "personal message enabled groups" site setting until the Discourse instance has been upgraded to a version that has been patched.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn affected Discourse versions, a broken access control allows moderators to convert personal messages to public topics even when they lack proper authorization to access those messages. This represents a privilege escalation vulnerability where moderator-level permissions can be abused to expose confidential PM content as public topics.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.5.4>= 2025.11.0, < 2025.11.2= 2025.12.0= 2026.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Discourse versionLog into the Discourse admin panel and navigate to /admin/about, or run `git log -1 --format='%H %s'` in the Discourse container to get the exact version commitAffected if The displayed version falls into any of these ranges: < 3.5.4, >= 2025.11.0 and < 2025.11.2, = 2025.12.0, or = 2026.1.0
-
Verify moderator role assignmentNavigate to /admin/users/list/active in the admin panel and filter or check for users with the 'moderator' trust level or moderator group membershipAffected if Any untrusted or low-privilege users are granted moderator access, as these users could exploit the vulnerability
-
Check personal message settingsGo to /admin/site_settings/category/all?filter=personal%20message in the admin panel and inspect the 'personal message enabled groups' settingAffected if The setting allows moderator group or broader groups to create personal messages, which would enable the attack surface for this vulnerability
You are affected if your Discourse version is any of the vulnerable releases listed (pre-3.5.4, 2025.11.0-2025.11.1, 2025.12.0, or 2026.1.0) and you have moderators who should not have access to convert PMs to public topics.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.5.42025.11.2
Upgrade Discourse to version 3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, or 2026.1.0. As a temporary workaround, revoke moderator role from untrusted users or remove the moderator group from the 'personal message enabled groups' site setting until patching is complete.
3.5.4, 2025.11.2, 2025.12.1, or 2026.1.0 (depending on your branch)
- Back up your Discourse database and application files before upgrading
- Identify your current Discourse version from the /admin dashboard or ./discourse version command
- For Discourse < 3.5.4: upgrade to version 3.5.4
- For Discourse >= 2025.11.0 and < 2025.11.2: upgrade to version 2025.11.2
- For Discourse = 2025.12.0: upgrade to version 2025.12.1
- For Discourse = 2026.1.0: upgrade to version 2026.1.0
- Run the Discourse upgrade command (typically ./discourse upgrade or through your deployment method)
- After upgrade, verify the version number matches the expected patched version in /admin dashboard
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21865 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21865 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data